Update to LLVM 19.1.1

[DianQK]

No known issues are fixed this time.

r? @rust-lang/wg-llvm

[rustbot]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• These commits modify submodules.

[nikic]

@bors r+ rollup=never

[bors]

📌 Commit 70260db has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-18 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

------
 > importing cache manifest from ghcr.io/rust-lang/rust-ci-cache:20950f2ccee3dff53a038adf5c1cf05231c0b30772617126a5f6478a66316a29cba9aead69f7bb0004886d32c1f8e6287542cf6d25130711c82d16a66201d4fe:
------
##[endgroup]
Setting extra environment values for docker:  --env ENABLE_GCC_CODEGEN=1 --env GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/lib/gcc/
[CI_JOB_NAME=x86_64-gnu-llvm-18]
---
sccache: Starting the server...
##[group]Configure the build
configure: processing command line
configure: 
configure: build.configure-args := ['--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu', '--llvm-root=/usr/lib/llvm-18', '--enable-llvm-link-shared', '--set', 'rust.randomize-layout=true', '--set', 'rust.thin-lto-import-instr-limit=10', '--set', 'change-id=99999999', '--enable-verbose-configure', '--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodules', '--enable-locked-deps', '--enable-cargo-native-static', '--set', 'rust.codegen-units-std=1', '--set', 'dist.compression-profile=balanced', '--dist-compression-formats=xz', '--set', 'rust.lld=false', '--disable-dist-src', '--release-channel=nightly', '--enable-debug-assertions', '--enable-overflow-checks', '--enable-llvm-assertions', '--set', 'rust.verify-llvm-ir', '--set', 'rust.codegen-backends=llvm,cranelift,gcc', '--set', 'llvm.static-libstdcpp', '--enable-new-symbol-mangling']
configure: target.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.llvm-config := /usr/lib/llvm-18/bin/llvm-config
configure: llvm.link-shared     := True
configure: rust.randomize-layout := True
configure: rust.thin-lto-import-instr-limit := 10
---
  Downloaded boml v0.3.1
   Compiling boml v0.3.1
   Compiling y v0.1.0 (/checkout/compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/build_system)
    Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 3.70s
     Running `/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-codegen/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/y test --use-system-gcc --use-backend gcc --out-dir /checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-tools/cg_gcc --release --mini-tests --std-tests`
Using system GCC
[BUILD] example
[AOT] mini_core_hello_world
/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-tools/cg_gcc/mini_core_hello_world
abc

[nikic]

2024-10-05T14:07:30.4627940Z failures:
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4628774Z 
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4629533Z ---- core::config::tests::download_ci_llvm stdout ----
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4630298Z thread 'core::config::tests::download_ci_llvm' panicked at src/core/config/tests.rs:33:5:
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4630892Z assertion `left == right` failed
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4631199Z   left: true
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4632659Z  right: false
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4632897Z 
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4632913Z 
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4633046Z failures:
2024-10-05T14:07:30.4633383Z     core::config::tests::download_ci_llvm

This also happened during the last LLVM update but didn't affect bors, so I'm keeping this in the queue.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 70260db with merge 85e2f55...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nikic
Pushing 85e2f55 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (85e2f55): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-6.7%	[-6.7%, -6.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-1.9%, -1.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-1.9%, -1.9%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary -1.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-1.1%, -1.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-1.1%, -1.1%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 774.047s -> 774.072s (0.00%)
Artifact size: 329.49 MiB -> 329.50 MiB (0.00%)