-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 3 pull requests #131532
Rollup of 3 pull requests #131532
Conversation
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
This hack was intended to handle the case where `-Clto=thin` causes the compiler to emit multiple output files (when producing LLVM-IR or assembly). The hack only affects 4 tests, of which 3 are just meta-tests for the hack itself. The one remaining test that motivated the hack currently doesn't even need it! (`tests/codegen/issues/issue-81408-dllimport-thinlto-windows.rs`)
make `llvm::is_ci_llvm_modified` logic more precise Fixes rust-lang#131303.
…youxu compiletest: Remove the magic hacks for finding output with `lto=thin` This hack was intended to handle the case where `-Clto=thin` causes the compiler to emit multiple output files (when producing LLVM-IR or assembly). The hack only affects 4 tests, of which 3 are just meta-tests for the hack itself. The one remaining test that motivated the hack currently doesn't even need it! (`tests/codegen/issues/issue-81408-dllimport-thinlto-windows.rs`)
compiletest: Simplify the choice of `--emit` mode for assembly tests Tiny little cleanup that I noticed while working on rust-lang#131524. No functional change. Historically, the original code structure (rust-lang#58791) predates the `Emit` enum (rust-lang#103298), so it was manually adding `--emit` flags to the compiler invocation. But now the match can just evaluate to the appropriate `Emit` value directly.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=3 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 0321e73d1c In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Finished benchmarking commit (ce697f9): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -1.1%, secondary -1.9%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary -0.9%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 780.89s -> 781.776s (0.11%) |
Successful merges:
llvm::is_ci_llvm_modified
logic more precise #131305 (makellvm::is_ci_llvm_modified
logic more precise)lto=thin
#131524 (compiletest: Remove the magic hacks for finding output withlto=thin
)--emit
mode for assembly tests #131525 (compiletest: Simplify the choice of--emit
mode for assembly tests)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup