Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use verbose for path separator suggestion #132780

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Nov 8, 2024

A single - of suggestion underlining that is adjacent to a much more significant ^^^ underlying of the LHS path component is hard to distinguish. IMO this presents much more cleanly when it's verbose, especially because it's a replacment suggestion.

r? estebank

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 8, 2024
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

estebank commented Nov 8, 2024

r=me as soon as CI is green

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

estebank commented Nov 8, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 8, 2024

📌 Commit 0e481b4 has been approved by estebank

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 8, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#132755 (Do not reveal opaques in the param-env, we got lazy norm instead)
 - rust-lang#132757 (Get rid of `check_opaque_type_well_formed`)
 - rust-lang#132760 (Don't suggest `.into_iter()` on iterators)
 - rust-lang#132778 (update io::Error::into_inner to acknowledge io::Error::other)
 - rust-lang#132780 (use verbose for path separator suggestion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c4922f1 into rust-lang:master Nov 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Nov 9, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#132780 - compiler-errors:verbose, r=estebank

use verbose for path separator suggestion

A single `-` of suggestion underlining that is adjacent to a much more significant `^^^` underlying of the LHS path component is hard to distinguish. IMO this presents much more cleanly when it's verbose, especially because it's a *replacment* suggestion.

r? estebank
mati865 pushed a commit to mati865/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
use verbose for path separator suggestion

A single `-` of suggestion underlining that is adjacent to a much more significant `^^^` underlying of the LHS path component is hard to distinguish. IMO this presents much more cleanly when it's verbose, especially because it's a *replacment* suggestion.

r? estebank
mati865 pushed a commit to mati865/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#132755 (Do not reveal opaques in the param-env, we got lazy norm instead)
 - rust-lang#132757 (Get rid of `check_opaque_type_well_formed`)
 - rust-lang#132760 (Don't suggest `.into_iter()` on iterators)
 - rust-lang#132778 (update io::Error::into_inner to acknowledge io::Error::other)
 - rust-lang#132780 (use verbose for path separator suggestion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants