-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #133259
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #133259
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Wrap all args with quotes. - Escape ^ and " inside quotes using ^. Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
… statement After: ``` error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13 | LL | const PAT: u32 = 0; | -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable ... LL | let PAT = v1; | ^^^ | | | pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered | help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var` | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u32` ``` Before: ``` error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13 | LL | let PAT = v1; | ^^^ | | | pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered | missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable | help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var` | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u32` ```
``` error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered --> $DIR/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs:2:11 | LL | match 1 { | ^ patterns `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered LL | x => {} | - this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `x` | = note: the matched value is of type `i32` note: constant `x` defined here --> $DIR/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs:7:5 | LL | const x: i32 = 4; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name | LL | x_var => {} | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL | x => {}, i32::MIN..=3_i32 | 5_i32..=i32::MAX => todo!() | ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ```
- Remove check for "how many path segments is the pattern" - Check before suggesting if the path has multiple path segments
uefi: process: Add args support - Wrap all args with quotes. - Escape ^ and " inside quotes using ^. - Doing reverse of arg parsing: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d571ae851d93541bef826c3c48c1e9ad99da77d6/library/std/src/sys/pal/uefi/args.rs#L81 r? joboet
…htriplett Mark `get_mut` and `set_position` in `std::io::Cursor` as const. Relevant tracking issue: rust-lang#130801 The methods `get_mut` and `set_position` can trivially be marked as const due to rust-lang#57349 being stabilised.
…ent, r=petrochenkov Store resolution for self and crate root module segments Let's make sure to record the segment resolution for `self::`, `crate::` and `$crate::`. I'm actually somewhat surprised that the only diagnostic that uses this is the one that errors on invalid generics on a module segment... but seems strictly more correct regardless, and there may be other diagnostics using these segments resolutions that just haven't been tested for `self`. Also includes a drive-by on `report_prohibit_generics_error`.
…eril Point at `const` definition when used instead of a binding in a `let` statement Modify `PatKind::InlineConstant` to be `ExpandedConstant` standing in not only for inline `const` blocks but also for `const` items. This allows us to track named `const`s used in patterns when the pattern is a single binding. When we detect that there is a refutable pattern involving a `const` that could have been a binding instead, we point at the `const` item, and suggest renaming. We do this for both `let` bindings and `match` expressions missing a catch-all arm if there's at least one single binding pattern referenced. After: ``` error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13 | LL | const PAT: u32 = 0; | -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable ... LL | let PAT = v1; | ^^^ pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u32` help: introduce a variable instead | LL | let PAT_var = v1; | ~~~~~~~ ``` Before: ``` error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13 | LL | let PAT = v1; | ^^^ | | | pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered | missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable | help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var` | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u32` ``` CC rust-lang#132582.
…e, r=lcnr Make `PointerLike` opt-in instead of built-in The `PointerLike` trait currently is a built-in trait that computes the layout of the type. This is a bit problematic, because types implement this trait automatically. Since this can be broken due to semver-compatible changes to a type's layout, this is undesirable. Also, calling `layout_of` in the trait system also causes cycles. This PR makes the trait implemented via regular impls, and adds additional validation on top to make sure that those impls are valid. This could eventually be `derive()`d for custom smart pointers, and we can trust *that* as a semver promise rather than risking library authors accidentally breaking it. On the other hand, we may never expose `PointerLike`, but at least now the implementation doesn't invoke `layout_of` which could cause ICEs or cause cycles. Right now for a `PointerLike` impl to be valid, it must be an ADT that is `repr(transparent)` and the non-1zst field needs to implement `PointerLike`. There are also some primitive impls for `&T`/ `&mut T`/`*const T`/`*mut T`/`Box<T>`.
…lexcrichton Account for `wasm32v1-none` when exporting TLS symbols Exporting TLS related symbols was limited to `wasm32-unknown-unknown` because WASI and Emscripten (?) have their own infrastructure to deal with TLS. However, the introduction of `wasm32v1-none` is in the same boat as `wasm32-unknown-unknown`. This PR adjust the mechanism to account for `wasm32v1-none` as well. See rust-lang#102385 and rust-lang#102440. r? `@alexcrichton`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Nov 20, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 20, 2024
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
I need to rebase #132207 since it has bitrotted in the 3 weeks it's been up. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
get_mut
andset_position
instd::io::Cursor
as const. #130800 (Markget_mut
andset_position
instd::io::Cursor
as const.)const
definition when used instead of a binding in alet
statement #132708 (Point atconst
definition when used instead of a binding in alet
statement)PointerLike
opt-in instead of built-in #133226 (MakePointerLike
opt-in instead of built-in)wasm32v1-none
when exporting TLS symbols #133244 (Account forwasm32v1-none
when exporting TLS symbols)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup