Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert #133418 (Store coverage source regions as Span) due to regression #133606 #133608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit adf9b5f, reversing changes made to af1ca15.

Reverting #133418 due to regressions reported at #133606.

r? jieyouxu

This reverts commit adf9b5f, reversing
changes made to af1ca15.

Reverting due to <rust-lang#133606>.
@Zalathar Zalathar added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label Nov 29, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 29, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 29, 2024

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors p=1 rollup=always

Once this passes PR CI, I might just self-approve as suggested on Forge.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Nov 29, 2024

You can r=me anyways since I looked at it 😄

@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

🟩

@bors r=jieyouxu

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2024

📌 Commit 9461f42 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 29, 2024
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
Revert rust-lang#133418 (Store coverage source regions as `Span`) due to regression rust-lang#133606

This reverts commit adf9b5f, reversing changes made to af1ca15.

Reverting rust-lang#133418 due to regressions reported at rust-lang#133606.

r? jieyouxu
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#131323 (Support `clobber_abi` in AVR inline assembly)
 - rust-lang#133092 (Always set the deployment target when building std)
 - rust-lang#133134 (Don't use a SyntheticProvider for literally every type)
 - rust-lang#133538 (Better diagnostic for fn items in variadic functions)
 - rust-lang#133590 (Rename `-Zparse-only`)
 - rust-lang#133592 (Misc: better instructions for envrc, ignore `/build` instead of `build/`)
 - rust-lang#133608 (Revert rust-lang#133418 (Store coverage source regions as `Span`) due to regression rust-lang#133606)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 9461f42 with merge cb2bd2b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing cb2bd2b to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 29, 2024
@bors bors merged commit cb2bd2b into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Nov 29, 2024
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the spans-revert branch November 29, 2024 08:38
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (cb2bd2b): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.0%, -1.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.0% [-1.0%, -1.0%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 773.667s -> 773.306s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 331.97 MiB -> 331.98 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants