Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the branch merging optimisations for slice patterns #16883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 4, 2014
Merged

Remove the branch merging optimisations for slice patterns #16883

merged 1 commit into from Sep 4, 2014

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Aug 30, 2014

They were only correct in the simplest case. Some of the optimisations
are certainly possible but should be introduced carefully and only
when the whole pattern codegen infrastructure is in a better shape.

Fixes #16648.

They were only correct in the simplest case. Some of the optimisations
are certainly possible but should be introduced carefully and only
when the whole pattern codegen infrastructure is in a better shape.

Fixes #16648.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
They were only correct in the simplest case. Some of the optimisations
are certainly possible but should be introduced carefully and only
when the whole pattern codegen infrastructure is in a better shape.

Fixes #16648.
@bors bors closed this Sep 4, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 6f35ede into rust-lang:master Sep 4, 2014
@ghost ghost deleted the issue-16648 branch September 13, 2014 13:23
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2024
minor: Do progress reporting for crate-graph construction

Also fixes rust-lang/rust-analyzer#16828
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect result when using match on tuple with slice
1 participant