Use consistent terminology for byte string literals #28167
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #28174) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Avoid confusion with binary integer literals and binary operator expressions in libsyntax
petrochenkov
force-pushed
the
bytelit
branch
from
fbf4cf9 to
405c616
Compare
|
Updated. |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 405c616 has been approved by |
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2015
Avoid confusion with binary integer literals and binary operator expressions in libsyntax
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Avoid confusion with binary integer literals and binary operator expressions in libsyntax