Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Makes formatting of struct keyword consistent #28182

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2015
Merged

Conversation

id4ho
Copy link
Contributor

@id4ho id4ho commented Sep 3, 2015

r? @steveklabnik

About the struct section specifically:

I wasn't sure how you'd feel about the first instance since it was originally capitalized, happy to change it back if you think that's better.

Also, I left 'tuple struct' as is since together it isn't a keyword. The first instance currently has single quotes but the others have nothing. I think that feels right.

Generally:

I'm working through the book now and I'm happy to keep updating this branch with any formatting tweaks or updates I find if that's easier for you guys, otherwise I'll just create smaller PRs as I go. Just let me know.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 3, 2015

📌 Commit 28bf68f has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Thanks! I was always unsure here, and just making them all this way is more consistent.

Please just send individual PRs! They're easier to land.

@id4ho
Copy link
Contributor Author

id4ho commented Sep 3, 2015

Cool! Sounds good.

Thanks for your work on the book, it's been a great starting point!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 3, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 28bf68f with merge 1661947...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2015
r? @steveklabnik

##### About the `struct` section specifically:
I wasn't sure how you'd feel about the first instance since it was originally capitalized, happy to change it back if you think that's better.

Also, I left 'tuple struct' as is since together it isn't a keyword. The first instance currently has single quotes but the others have nothing. I think that feels right.

##### Generally:
I'm working through the book now and I'm happy to keep updating this branch with any formatting tweaks or updates I find if that's easier for you guys, otherwise I'll just create smaller PRs as I go. Just let me know.
@bors bors merged commit 28bf68f into rust-lang:master Sep 3, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants