Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for break and cont to rustc #294

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2011
Merged

Add support for break and cont to rustc #294

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2011

Conversation

marijnh
Copy link
Contributor

@marijnh marijnh commented Mar 27, 2011

You might want to double-check the changes I made to trans_for. Tests still pass, but I must say I'm not 100% clear on what I was doing there.

@marijnh
Copy link
Contributor Author

marijnh commented Mar 27, 2011

Hold on, that one doesn't clean up the loop variable created by for at all. I'll refine it tomorrow.

@marijnh marijnh closed this Mar 27, 2011
@marijnh marijnh reopened this Mar 27, 2011
@marijnh
Copy link
Contributor Author

marijnh commented Mar 27, 2011

Err. Reopened. Seems the way I did it makes sense after all, and the block created in trans_for/inner does own the loop variable.

@graydon graydon merged commit 6ecdc04 into rust-lang:master Mar 28, 2011
oli-obk pushed a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2017
keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
Added nice, setpriority and getpriority along with constants and type…

… definitions
kazcw pushed a commit to kazcw/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2018
* Remove `PartialEq for __m64`

This helps to strip the public API of the vendor type for now, although this may
come back at a later date!

* Remove `PartialEq for __m128i`

Like the previous commit, but for another type!

* Remove `PartialEq for __m256i`

Same as previous commit!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants