Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

avoid "==" in assert! when one of the values is a bool #32761

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2016
Merged

avoid "==" in assert! when one of the values is a bool #32761

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2016

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

@tshepang tshepang commented Apr 6, 2016

Is suspect this is something of an idiom

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 6, 2016

📌 Commit 922e666 has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2016
avoid "==" in assert! when one of the values is a bool

Is suspect this is something of an idiom
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2016
avoid "==" in assert! when one of the values is a bool

Is suspect this is something of an idiom
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2016
avoid "==" in assert! when one of the values is a bool

Is suspect this is something of an idiom
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2016
Rollup of 12 pull requests

- Successful merges: #31762, #32538, #32634, #32668, #32679, #32691, #32724, #32727, #32744, #32761, #32766, #32774
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 922e666 into rust-lang:master Apr 6, 2016
@tshepang tshepang deleted the assert branch April 7, 2016 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants