Use different syntax for checks that matter to typestate #346
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This giant commit changes the syntax of Rust to use "assert" for "check" expressions that didn't mean anything to the typestate system, and continue using "check" for checks that are used as part of typestate checking. Most of the changes are just replacing "check" with "assert" in test cases and rustc.
|
Integrated, thanks. |
oli-obk
pushed a commit
to oli-obk/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2017
Only run appveyor on the master branch and on PRs
keeperofdakeys
pushed a commit
to keeperofdakeys/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2017
Add `getpgid`.
kazcw
pushed a commit
to kazcw/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2018
This commit renames the `is_target_feature_detected!` macro to have different names depending on the platform. For example: * `is_x86_feature_detected!` * `is_arm_feature_detected!` * `is_aarch64_feature_detected!` * `is_powerpc64_feature_detected!` Each macro already has a platform-specific albeit similar interface. Currently, though, each macro takes a different set of strings so the hope is that like with the name of the architecture in the module we can signal the dangers of using the macro in a platform-agnostic context. One liberty taken with the macro currently though is to on both the x86 and x86_64 architectures name the macro `is_x86_feature_detected` rather than also having an `is_x86_64_feature_detected`. This mirrors, however, how all the intrinsics are named the same on x86/x86_64.
dlrobertson
pushed a commit
to dlrobertson/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2018
Wrap binary32 and binary64 in quotes
ZuseZ4
pushed a commit
to EnzymeAD/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2023
workingjubilee
pushed a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2023
Fix inaccurate safety comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This giant commit changes the syntax of Rust to use "assert" for
"check" expressions that didn't mean anything to the typestate
system, and continue using "check" for checks that are used as
part of typestate checking.
Most of the changes are just replacing "check" with "assert" in test
cases and rustc.