Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated e0493 to new format (+ bonus). #36212

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2016

Conversation

razielgn
Copy link
Contributor

@razielgn razielgn commented Sep 2, 2016

Part of #35233.
Fixes #35999.

r? @jonathandturner

I'm not satisfied with the bonus part, there has to be an easier way to reach into the Drop's span implementation. I'm all ears. :)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @jonathandturner (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.


const F : Foo = Foo { a : 0 };
//~^ ERROR constants are not allowed to have destructors [E0493]
//~| NOTE constants cannot have destructors
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because we're updating the span, can you move this test over to somewhere in the src/test/ui directory so that we can test the output?

UI tests are pretty straightforward. The compiler runs them then compares the output with the corresponding .stderr file. If they match, it passes. You can look at the other .stderr files to see how it's done.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting, I didn't know about this. :) Done!

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

sophiajt commented Sep 2, 2016

Cool :)

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 2, 2016

📌 Commit 059094f has been approved by jonathandturner

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2016
…t, r=jonathandturner

Updated e0493 to new format (+ bonus).

Part of rust-lang#35233.
Fixes rust-lang#35999.

r? @jonathandturner

I'm not satisfied with the bonus part, there has to be an easier way to reach into the `Drop`'s span implementation. I'm all ears. :)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2016
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #36070, #36132, #36200, #36212, #36225, #36231, #36234
- Failed merges:
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2016
…t, r=jonathandturner

Updated e0493 to new format (+ bonus).

Part of rust-lang#35233.
Fixes rust-lang#35999.

r? @jonathandturner

I'm not satisfied with the bonus part, there has to be an easier way to reach into the `Drop`'s span implementation. I'm all ears. :)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2016
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #36070, #36132, #36200, #36212, #36225, #36231, #36234
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 059094f into rust-lang:master Sep 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants