Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libtest: add --exact to make filter matching exact #38181

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2016

Conversation

jsgf
Copy link
Contributor

@jsgf jsgf commented Dec 5, 2016

Filter matching is by substring by default. This makes it impossible
to run a single test if its name is a substring of some other test.
For example, its not possible to run just mymod::test with these
tests:

  mymod::test
  mymod::test1
  mymod::test_module::moretests

You could declare by convention that no test has a name that's a
substring of another test, but that's not really practical.

This PR adds the --exact flag, to make filter matching exactly
match the complete name.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @sfackler (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@jsgf jsgf force-pushed the test-filter-exact branch from 92089c8 to ce0bd61 Compare December 5, 2016 22:31
Filter matching is by substring by default. This makes it impossible
to run a single test if its name is a substring of some other test.
For example, its not possible to run just "mymod::test" with these
tests:

  mymod::test
  mymod::test1
  mymod::test_module::moretests

You could declare by convention that no test has a name that's a
substring of another test, but that's not really practical.

This PR adds the "--exact" flag, to make filter matching exactly
match the complete name.
@sfackler
Copy link
Member

sfackler commented Dec 6, 2016

Seems reasonable to me, though I'll defer to the @rust-lang/rools team. This is something that's bugged me in the past!

r? @alexcrichton

@alexcrichton alexcrichton added the relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. label Dec 9, 2016
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 13, 2016

📌 Commit 5bf4d6f has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 14, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 5bf4d6f with merge aa7a2e9...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2016
libtest: add --exact to make filter matching exact

Filter matching is by substring by default. This makes it impossible
to run a single test if its name is a substring of some other test.
For example, its not possible to run just `mymod::test` with these
tests:

```
  mymod::test
  mymod::test1
  mymod::test_module::moretests
```

You could declare by convention that no test has a name that's a
substring of another test, but that's not really practical.

This PR adds the `--exact` flag, to make filter matching exactly
match the complete name.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants