Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unignore android for previously spuriously failing test. #41618

Closed

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum commented Apr 29, 2017

Will see if this start failing again, in which case we'll re-ignore the test.

In theory, #20004 could be fixed by this. I've left that open because it's possible that this will resume the previous spurious failures, and marked it as A-spurious so people doing PR triage catch that. I will leave a comment there saying that if we see failures from this test on android, we should re-ignore it.

Will see if this start failing again, in which case we'll re-ignore the test.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Apr 29, 2017

Let's give it a shot! A bunch has changed since then...

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 29, 2017

📌 Commit bd4191d has been approved by aturon

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2017
…turon

Unignore android for previously spuriously failing test.

Will see if this start failing again, in which case we'll re-ignore the test.

In theory, rust-lang#20004 could be fixed by this. I've left that open because it's possible that this will resume the previous spurious failures, and marked it as A-spurious so people doing PR triage catch that. I will leave a comment there saying that if we see failures from this test on android, we should re-ignore it.
@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

Ah. Unfortunate. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants