-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More align_offset
things
#44537
More align_offset
things
#44537
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
3f8abb7
to
18ab95f
Compare
src/libstd/sys_common/memchr.rs
Outdated
let mut offset; | ||
if align > 0 { | ||
offset = cmp::min(usize_bytes - align, len); | ||
let mut offset = unsafe { align_offset(ptr as *const _, usize_bytes) }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be using the inherent methods added in this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The compiler complained that it doesn't know the unstable feature (on stage0). This would become a mess of cfgs, so I opted to not do this here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds like a stage0 inherent method on pointers which does the old method via casts and not(stage0) uses the intrinsic?
src/libcore/ptr.rs
Outdated
/// remove me after the next release | ||
pub fn align_offset(self, align: usize) -> usize { | ||
unsafe { | ||
intrinsics::align_offset(self as *const _, align) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks the same as the above function? I think the #[cfg]
in the intrinsics
module should be enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It differs in the stability. I couldn't use the function within core without giving core the corresponding feature, which then complained about an unknown feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I understand this? Can't the stage0 shim in the intrinsics module be just as unstable as the real intrinsic in non-stage0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I must have misread the error messages I got. It works now without duplicating the inherent methods. The intrinsics are still duplicated.
@bors: r+ |
📌 Commit 1462cab has been approved by |
@bors: rollup |
More `align_offset` things cc rust-lang#44488
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #43964) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Rebased |
@bors: r+ |
📌 Commit 2787a28 has been approved by |
More `align_offset` things cc rust-lang#44488
More `align_offset` things cc rust-lang#44488
make memrchr use align_offset I hope I did not screw that up... Cc @oli-obk who authored the original rust-lang#44537
cc #44488