Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[rustllvm] Use report_fatal_error over llvm_unreachable #46124

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2017

Conversation

hanna-kruppe
Copy link
Contributor

This makes it more robust when assertions are disabled, crashing instead of causing UB.

Also introduces a tidy check to enforce this rule, which in turn necessitated making tidy run on src/rustllvm.

Fixes #44020

This makes it more robust when assertions are disabled,
crashing instead of causing UB.

Also introduces a tidy check to enforce this rule,
which in turn necessitated making tidy run on src/rustllvm.

Fixes rust-lang#44020
@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Nov 20, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 20, 2017

📌 Commit 296aa96 has been approved by arielb1

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 20, 2017
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2017
[rustllvm] Use report_fatal_error over llvm_unreachable

This makes it more robust when assertions are disabled, crashing instead of causing UB.

Also introduces a tidy check to enforce this rule, which in turn necessitated making tidy run on `src/rustllvm`.

Fixes rust-lang#44020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2017
Rollup of 9 pull requests

- Successful merges: #46082, #46088, #46092, #46107, #46119, #46121, #46122, #46124, #46128
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 296aa96 into rust-lang:master Nov 21, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants