-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not expand a derive invocation when derive is not allowed #47013
Conversation
1. Change the return type of `expand_invoc()` and its subroutines to `Option<Expansion>` from `Expansion`. 2. Return `None` when expanding a derive invocation if the item cannot have derive on it (in `expand_derive_invoc()`).
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit f4a76f3 has been approved by |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
test/run-pass-fulldeps/proc-macro/issue-40001.rs
is failing:
[01:05:24] error: Missing 'whitelited_attr' attribute
[01:05:24] --> /checkout/src/test/run-pass-fulldeps/proc-macro/issue-40001.rs:18:1
[01:05:24] |
[01:05:24] 18 | fn main() {}
[01:05:24] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[01:05:24] |
[01:05:24] = note: #[deny(missing_whitelisted_attr)] on by default
[01:05:24]
[01:05:24] error: aborting due to previous error
@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for MissingWhitelistedAttrPass { | |||
_ => cx.tcx.hir.expect_item(cx.tcx.hir.get_parent(id)), | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
if !item.attrs.iter().any(|a| a.check_name("whitelisted_attr")) { | |||
if attr::contains_name(&item.attrs, "whitelisted_attr") { | |||
cx.span_lint(MISSING_WHITELISTED_ATTR, span, | |||
"Missing 'whitelited_attr' attribute"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a typo: whitelited
-> whitelisted
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I forgot !
. I fixed the whitelited
typo as well.
f4a76f3
to
d882691
Compare
@bors r=petrochenkov |
📌 Commit d882691 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Closes #46655.
The first commit is what actually closes #46655. The second one is just a refactoring I have done while waiting on a test.