Includes rust-lang/book#1088 and
rust-lang/book@62210e3

Closes rust-lang#29149

In rust-lang#46980 ("in which the unused-parens lint..." (14982db)), the
unused-parens lint was made to check function and method arguments,
which it previously did not (seemingly due to oversight rather than
willful design). However, in rust-lang#47775 and discussion thereon,
user–developers of Geal/nom and graphql-rust/juniper reported that the
lint was seemingly erroneously triggering on certain complex macros in
those projects. While this doesn't seem like a bug in the lint in the
particular strict sense that the expanded code would, in fact, contain
unncecessary parentheses, it also doesn't seem like the sort of thing
macro authors should have to think about: the spirit of the
unused-parens lint is to prevent needless clutter in code, not to give
macro authors extra heartache in the handling of token trees.

We propose the expediency of declining to lint unused parentheses in
function or method args inside of nested expansions: we believe that
this should eliminate the petty, troublesome lint warnings reported
in the issue, without forgoing the benefits of the lint in simpler
macros.

It seemed like too much duplicated code for the `Call` and `MethodCall`
match arms to duplicate the nested-macro check in addition to each
having their own `for` loop, so this occasioned a slight refactor so
that the function and method cases could share code—hopefully the
overall intent is at least no less clear to the gentle reader.

This is concerning rust-lang#47775.

and improve printing of errors

Previously, the `guard::init()` and `guard::current()` functions were
returning a `usize` address representing the top of the stack guard,
respectively for the main thread and for spawned threads.  The `SIGSEGV`
handler on `unix` targets checked if a fault was within one page below
that address, if so reporting it as a stack overflow.

Now `unix` targets report a `Range<usize>` representing the guard
memory, so it can cover arbitrary guard sizes.  Non-`unix` targets which
always return `None` for guards now do so with `Option<!>`, so they
don't pay any overhead.

For `linux-gnu` in particular, the previous guard upper-bound was
`stackaddr + guardsize`, as the protected memory was *inside* the stack.
This was a glibc bug, and starting from 2.27 they are moving the guard
*past* the end of the stack.  However, there's no simple way for us to
know where the guard page actually lies, so now we declare it as the
whole range of `stackaddr ± guardsize`, and any fault therein will be
called a stack overflow.  This fixes rust-lang#47863.

Fixes rust-lang#46578.

…chton

Update book

This PR does two things:

1. update the book to include rust-lang/book#1088
2. update to mdbook 0.1

Both of these things are big changes, so I want to land them now, well before the next branch, so we can kick the tires.

------------------------------

Locally, I'm seeing some weirdness around the reference and this:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27786/35411917-8dcbb31a-01e8-11e8-8c30-0bd280d93b9d.png)

Putting this PR up so others can try and build and see if it reproduces for them.

…, r=eddyb

Fix const evaluation ICE in rustdoc

Fixes rust-lang#47860.

r? @eddyb

… r=nikomatsakis

Do not ignore lifetime bounds in Copy impls

cc rust-lang#29149

r? @nikomatsakis

…ssary_unnecessary_parens, r=nikomatsakis

decline to lint technically-unnecessary parens in function or method arguments inside of nested macros

In rust-lang#46980 ("in which the unused-parens lint..." (14982db)), the
unused-parens lint was made to check function and method arguments,
which it previously did not (seemingly due to oversight rather than
willful design). However, in rust-lang#47775 and discussion thereon,
user–developers of Geal/nom and graphql-rust/juniper reported that the
lint was seemingly erroneously triggering on certain complex macros in
those projects. While this doesn't seem like a bug in the lint in the
particular strict sense that the expanded code would, in fact, contain
unncecessary parentheses, it also doesn't seem like the sort of thing
macro authors should have to think about: the spirit of the
unused-parens lint is to prevent needless clutter in code, not to give
macro authors extra heartache in the handling of token trees.

We propose the expediency of declining to lint unused parentheses in
function or method args inside of nested expansions: we believe that
this should eliminate the petty, troublesome lint warnings reported
in the issue, without forgoing the benefits of the lint in simpler
macros.

It seemed like too much duplicated code for the `Call` and `MethodCall`
match arms to duplicate the nested-macro check in addition to each
having their own `for` loop, so this occasioned a slight refactor so
that the function and method cases could share code—hopefully the
overall intent is at least no less clear to the gentle reader.

This is concerning rust-lang#47775.

…ichton

Use a range to identify SIGSEGV in stack guards

Previously, the `guard::init()` and `guard::current()` functions were
returning a `usize` address representing the top of the stack guard,
respectively for the main thread and for spawned threads.  The `SIGSEGV`
handler on `unix` targets checked if a fault was within one page below that
address, if so reporting it as a stack overflow.

Now `unix` targets report a `Range<usize>` representing the guard memory,
so it can cover arbitrary guard sizes.  Non-`unix` targets which always
return `None` for guards now do so with `Option<!>`, so they don't pay any
overhead.

For `linux-gnu` in particular, the previous guard upper-bound was
`stackaddr + guardsize`, as the protected memory was *inside* the stack.
This was a glibc bug, and starting from 2.27 they are moving the guard
*past* the end of the stack.  However, there's no simple way for us to know
where the guard page actually lies, so now we declare it as the whole range
of `stackaddr ± guardsize`, and any fault therein will be called a stack
overflow.  This fixes rust-lang#47863.

…n, r=bluss

Implement TrustedLen for Take<Repeat> and Take<RangeFrom>

This will allow optimization of simple `repeat(x).take(n).collect()` iterators, which are currently not vectorized and have capacity checks.

This will only support a few aggregates on `Repeat` and `RangeFrom`, which might be enough for simple cases, but doesn't optimize more complex ones. Namely, Cycle, StepBy, Filter, FilterMap, Peekable, SkipWhile, Skip, FlatMap, Fuse and Inspect are not marked `TrustedLen` when the inner iterator is infinite.

Previous discussion can be found in rust-lang#47082

r? @alexcrichton

…inning_vert, r=petrochenkov

Stabilize feature(match_beginning_vert)

With this feature stabilized, match expressions can optionally have a `|` at the beginning of each arm.

Reference PR: rust-lang/reference#231

Closes rust-lang#44101

ui tests: diff from old (expected) to new (actual) instead of backwards.

Previously `actual` was "old" and `expected` was "new" which resulted in `+` before `-`.
AFAIK all diff tools put `-` before `+`, which made the previous behavior *very confusing*.

r? @nikomatsakis

Clarify shared file handler behavior of File::try_clone.

Fixes rust-lang#46578.