Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicit self in diagnostic #4897

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Explicit self in diagnostic #4897

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

recrack
Copy link
Contributor

@recrack recrack commented Feb 12, 2013

No description provided.

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

Do you mind rebasing this against the current incoming and pushing the new version (you can just push to your explicit-self branch again with -f) so that it'll be easier to merge this? Thanks!

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

I rebased this. Alas, in the meantime somebody else had done more or less the same work. Sorry, it happens sometimes!

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 2, 2020
…-float-functions, r=flip1995

Add lint to improve floating-point expressions

Looks for floating-point expressions that can be expressed using built-in methods to improve accuracy, performance and/or succinctness.

changelog: Add lint `floating_point_improvements`.

Fixes rust-lang#4726
Partly addresses [rust-lang#2040](rust-lang/rust-clippy#2040)

Currently linted expressions:

| Expression | Suggestion |
|---------------------------------|------------|
| x.log(2.0) | x.log2() |
| x.log(10.0) | x.log10() |
| x.log(std::f32::consts::E) | x.ln() |
| (1 + x).ln() | x.ln_1p() |
| (2.0).powf(x) | x.exp2() |
| (std::f32::consts::E).powf(x) | x.exp() |
| x.powf(1/2) | x.sqrt() |
| x.powf(1/3) | x.cbrt() |
| x.powf(y), where y is whole | x.powi(y) |
| x.exp() - 1 | x.exp_m1() |
|x * y + z|x.mul_add(y, z)|
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants