Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document that Unique::empty() and NonNull::dangling() aren't sentinel values #52508

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions src/libcore/ptr.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2703,6 +2703,11 @@ impl<T: Sized> Unique<T> {
///
/// This is useful for initializing types which lazily allocate, like
/// `Vec::new` does.
///
/// Note that the pointer value may potentially represent a valid pointer to
/// a `T`, which means this must not be used as a "not yet initialized"
/// sentinel value. Types that lazily allocate must track initialization by
/// some other means.
// FIXME: rename to dangling() to match NonNull?
pub const fn empty() -> Self {
unsafe {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2834,6 +2839,11 @@ impl<T: Sized> NonNull<T> {
///
/// This is useful for initializing types which lazily allocate, like
/// `Vec::new` does.
///
/// Note that the pointer value may potentially represent a valid pointer to
/// a `T`, which means this must not be used as a "not yet initialized"
/// sentinel value. Types that lazily allocate must track initialization by
/// some other means.
#[stable(feature = "nonnull", since = "1.25.0")]
pub fn dangling() -> Self {
unsafe {
Expand Down