Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Begin refactoring deriving code and implement #[deriving(TotalOrd)] #5376

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Begin refactoring deriving code and implement #[deriving(TotalOrd)] #5376

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 14, 2013

The first commit breaks the 1200-line deriving.rs into multiple submodules, one for each derivable trait. I haven't made any effort yet to clean that code up, however.

The second commit introduces #[deriving(TotalOrd)], which creates an implementation based on the successive comparison of all struct/enum fields in their declaration order. A future patch will allow this to be configured in the attribute.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 14, 2013

Hold off on reviewing this; there's one small issue I just uncovered. Will rebase shortly.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 14, 2013

Rebase complete.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 15, 2013

Closing this while I do some more work on it.

@ghost ghost closed this Mar 15, 2013
@ghost ghost reopened this Mar 15, 2013
@ghost ghost closed this Mar 15, 2013
@ghost ghost deleted the deriving branch March 15, 2013 17:39
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 2, 2020
…n, r=matthiaskrgr

Move verbose_file_reads to restriction

cc rust-lang#5368

Using `File::read` instead of  `fs::read_to_end` does make sense in multiple cases, so this lint is rather restriction, than complexity

changelog: Move [`verbose_file_reads`] to restriction
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant