Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unbreak the RLS #57285

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Unbreak the RLS #57285

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Xanewok
Copy link
Member

@Xanewok Xanewok commented Jan 2, 2019

Breakage was due to #55937, which seems to have introduced a regression (tracked over at #57280).
Clippy updates don't matter in-tree because we patch it with the in-tree version - rust-lang/rls@085e926 is the important change.

r? @nikomatsakis

cc @nrc

Breakage was due to rust-lang#55937,
which seemed to introduce a regression (tracked over at
rust-lang#57280).
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • These commits modify submodules.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 2, 2019
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@Xanewok seems fine -- I expect we'll have a fix for the regression soon though. But I guess it makes sense to move forward anyway?

@Xanewok
Copy link
Member Author

Xanewok commented Jan 3, 2019

I think it doesn’t hurt to get this to unbreak the toolstate so there’s no pressure on the regression fix, but I have no idea - maybe it makes sense to wait, if the regression fix is important and will land soon!

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

Fix is in #57304

@Xanewok
Copy link
Member Author

Xanewok commented Jan 3, 2019

Awesome, thanks! I’ll close this then, since the only thing this updates is working around this.

@Xanewok Xanewok closed this Jan 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants