Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add FromStr impl for NonZero types #58717
Add FromStr impl for NonZero types #58717
Changes from all commits
36bcbc3
ce30d4e
912ad68
ad240ea
7330525
8f3e862
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh wow I don't know what I thought when I wrote that code, maybe I just forgot the semantics of
<<
, even when it doesn't panic - at least it's not UB!Nevermind, it wasn't me, see #55701 (comment).
Also, the
assert_eq!
I suggested in da7b6b4, during #54004, was removed, which means debuggers may be getting bad values now (if we started allowingu128
enum
discriminants).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you're touching this code, can you add the
assert_eq!(value as u64 as u128, value);
I'm suggesting in #55701 (comment)?