-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #60291
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #60291
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was left over from when closure copy and clone were gated behind feature flags.
Here, ExprKind::Use(P<Expr>) tweaks the drop order to act the same way as '{ let _tmp = expr; _tmp }' does.
…sed by the compiler during optimizations.
…ure, r=ollie27 Prevent failure in case no space left on device in rustdoc Fixes rust-lang#59703. r? @QuietMisdreavus
…nishearth Fix index-page generation Fixes rust-lang#60096. The minifier was minifying crates name in `searchIndex` key position, which was a bit problematic for multiple reasons. r? @rust-lang/rustdoc
Add Pin::{into_inner,into_inner_unchecked} These functions are useful for unsafe code that needs to temporarily pull smart pointers out of the `Pin`, e.g. [the change that inspired them](Nemo157/futures-rs@b436178#diff-1a4e0ba4d1b539412ca576411ec6c7c2R258) is taking a `Pin<Box<dyn Future>>`, turning it into a `*mut dyn Future` via `Box::into_raw(unsafe { Pin::into_inner_unchecked(pin) })` then later dropping this via `drop(Pin::from(Box::from_raw(ptr)))`. This can be accomplished today via `{ let ptr = unsafe { Pin::get_unchecked_mut(pin.as_mut()) } as *mut dyn Future; mem::forget(pin); ptr }`, but this is far more complicated and loses out on the symmetry of using `Box::into_raw` and `Box::from_raw`. I'll extend the documentation on what guarantees `into_inner_unchecked` needs to uphold once I get some feedback on whether this API is wanted or not. r? @withoutboats
…=scalexm Chalkify: Add builtin Copy/Clone r? @nikomatsakis
…ps, r=oli-obk Introduce hir::ExprKind::Use and employ in for loop desugaring. In the `for $pat in $expr $block` desugaring we end with a `{ let _result = $match_expr; _result }` construct which makes `for` loops into a terminating scope and affects drop order. The construct was introduced in year 2015 by @pnkfelix in rust-lang#21984. This PR replaces the construct with `hir::ExprKind::Use(P<hir::Expr>)` which is equivalent semantically but should hopefully be less costly in terms of compile time performance (to be determined). This is extracted out of rust-lang@91b0abd from rust-lang#59288 for easier review and so that the perf implications wrt. `for`-loops can be measured. r? @oli-obk
Implement Debug for Place using Place::iterate r? @oli-obk
…, r=Centril Derive Default instead of new in applicable lint Closes rust-lang#60181 As far as I can see, at least within the `src/librustc_lint` directory this is the only place this is applicable.
…ss, r=alexcrichton PGO: Add a run-make test that makes sure that PGO profiling data is used by the compiler during optimizations. From the tests comment section: ``` # This test makes sure that PGO profiling data leads to cold functions being # marked as `cold` and hot functions with `inlinehint`. # The test program contains an `if` were actual execution only ever takes the # `else` branch. Accordingly, we expect the function that is never called to # be marked as cold. ``` r? @alexcrichton
…richton Add feature-gate for f16c target feature r? @alexcrichton
Do not ICE when checking types against foreign fn Fix rust-lang#60275.
@bors r+ p=10 |
📌 Commit 31a710d has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 25, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 31a710d with merge f54d87aea1a0abecd3b240c369d0798903ab706d... |
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 26, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost