Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Prerequisites from dep graph refactoring #60559

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor

@Zoxc Zoxc commented May 5, 2019

Split out from #60035

r? @eddyb

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 5, 2019
@Zoxc Zoxc force-pushed the dep-stream-prefix branch from 0ebfc5a to f7049ec Compare May 5, 2019 12:29
@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented May 5, 2019

I'm not sure what's happening with the threading here, tbh.
r? @michaelwoerister, @alexcrichton or @nikomatsakis

@Zoxc Zoxc force-pushed the dep-stream-prefix branch from f7049ec to f7acd27 Compare May 6, 2019 07:37
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 10, 2019

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #60683) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
use super::{Lrc, Lock};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add module level documentation here that describes what this is? In particular:

  • When would I use this? What are the typical use cases?
  • How do I use it? A usage example would be good.
  • Do I instantiate it myself? Is there already an executor available in the context somewhere?
  • What is the usage protocol? Do I need to worry about deadlocks? Resource management?
  • Does it integrate with the jobserver?
  • Is there anything else that users should be aware of?

// inherent impls is considered dirty.
//
// [the plan]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-roadmap/issues/4

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice find!

@michaelwoerister michaelwoerister added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 17, 2019
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

Triage ping @Zoxc, this is waiting for a few merge conflicts to be resolved, and there are outstanding review comments to be addressed

@Zoxc Zoxc force-pushed the dep-stream-prefix branch from f7acd27 to 86e1d91 Compare June 18, 2019 01:38
@Zoxc Zoxc changed the title Prerequisites from dep graph refactoring [WIP] Prerequisites from dep graph refactoring Jul 1, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2019
Prerequisites from dep graph refactoring rust-lang#2

Split out from rust-lang#60035 and overlaps with rust-lang#60559.
@joelpalmer
Copy link

Ping from Triage: @Zoxc is there an update on this? Thanks!

@totsteps
Copy link
Member

Ping from triage @Zoxc any updates? This is waiting for some review comments to be addressed and merge conflicts to be resolved.

@fmckeogh
Copy link
Member

fmckeogh commented Aug 6, 2019

Hello! Second ping from triage, @Zoxc please feel free to reopen when you have the time (Also note that pushing to the PR while it is closed prevents it from being reopened).

@rustbot modify labels to +S-inactive-closed, -S-waiting-on-author

@fmckeogh fmckeogh closed this Aug 6, 2019
@rustbot rustbot added S-inactive Status: Inactive and waiting on the author. This is often applied to closed PRs. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-inactive Status: Inactive and waiting on the author. This is often applied to closed PRs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants