-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
don't ICE on large files #61908
Merged
Merged
don't ICE on large files #61908
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 17, 2019
matklad
commented
Jun 17, 2019
This is an extremely marginal error, so the cost of properly threading `Handler` everywhere just not seemed justified. However, it's useful to panic when we create a file, and not when we slice strings with overflown indexes somewhere in the guts of the compiler. For this reason, while we provide safe `try_new_source_file`, we don't change the existing public interface and just panic more or less cleanly.
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit ccb2dfb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 17, 2019
For posterity, I am not adding a test here because that will require a lot of resources for a really marginal error. |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2019
don't ICE on large files This is an extremely marginal error, so the cost of properly threading `Handler` everywhere just not seemed justified. However, it's useful to panic when we create a file, and not when we slice strings with overflown indexes somewhere in the guts of the compiler. For this reason, while we provide safe `try_new_source_file`, we don't change the existing public interface and just panic more or less cleanly. closes rust-lang#61904 r? @petrochenkov
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #61702 (test more variants of enum-int-casting) - #61836 (Replace some uses of NodeId with HirId) - #61885 (Help LLVM better optimize slice::Iter(Mut)::len) - #61893 (make `Weak::ptr_eq`s into methods) - #61908 (don't ICE on large files) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an extremely marginal error, so the cost of properly threading
Handler
everywhere just not seemed justified. However, it's usefulto panic when we create a file, and not when we slice strings with
overflown indexes somewhere in the guts of the compiler.
For this reason, while we provide safe
try_new_source_file
, we don'tchange the existing public interface and just panic more or less
cleanly.
closes #61904
r? @petrochenkov