Rollup of 4 pull requests #62237
Closed
Rollup of 4 pull requests #62237
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
So far it is assumed that using a DLL as a -l parameter argument is ok, but the assumption doesn't hold when compiling the native code with llvm. In which case, an import library is required, so let's build one This also requires the cargo counterpart to add the import library in the stamp files, at least when compiling libstd. Otherwise, the files don't get uplifted
So that uwp-windows-gnu also gets its startup objects built
libgcc's support is using forbidden functions
As Rtl* functions are not allowed there
Attempt to create sockets with the WSA_FLAG_NO_HANDLE_INHERIT flag, and handle the potential error gracefully (as the flag isn't support on Windows 7 before SP1)
Or rather expose it, but always return an error
The required functions are not available, so hope for the best
This pulls in a commit which uses parallel xz encoding which should hopefully help shave some time off the dist builders which spend an inordinate amount of time compressing this data.
Add support for UWP targets Hi, This pull request aims at adding support for UWP (Universal Windows Apps) platform. A few notes: - This requires a very recent mingw-w64 version (containing this commit and the previous related ones: mirror/mingw-w64@e8c433c#diff-eefdfbfe9cec5f4ebab88c9a64d423a9) - This was tested using LLVM/clang rather than gcc, and so far it assumes that LLVM/clang will be the native compiler. This is mostly due to the fact that the support for exceptions/stack unwinding for UWP got much more attention in libunwind - The "uwp" part of the target needs support for it in the `cc-rs` & `backtrace-rs` crates. I'll create the MR there right after I submit this one and will link everything together, but I'm not sure what's the correct way of dealing with external dependencies in the context of rust - Enabling import libraries and copying them across stages requires a change in cargo, for which I'll open a MR right after I submit this one as well - The i686 stack unwinding is unsupported for now, because LLVM assumes SjLj, while rust seems to assume SEH will be used. I'm unsure how to fix this Also, this is my first encounter with rust, so please bear with my code, it might not feel so idiomatic or even correct :) I'm pretty sure there's a way of doing things in a cleaner way when it comes to win/c.rs, maybe having a UWP & desktop specific modules, and import those conditionally? It doesn't feel right to sprinkle `#[cfg(...)]` all over the place Off course, I'll gladly update anything you see fit (to the extent of my abilities/knowledge :) )! Thanks,
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
…ark-Simulacrum Update the `rust-installer` submodule This pulls in a commit which uses parallel xz encoding which should hopefully help shave some time off the dist builders which spend an inordinate amount of time compressing this data.
…omez rustdoc: remove unused derives and variants Though many structs in rustdoc derive `RustcEncodable` and `RustcDecodable`, the impls do not appear to be used by the crate or its dependents. Removing them revealed some enum variants that are never constructed, too. r? @GuillaumeGomez
|
@bors r+ p=4 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit b30f62f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
rust-installersubmodule #62153 (Update therust-installersubmodule)Failed merges:
r? @ghost