Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add const-eval support for SIMD types, insert, and extract #64738
Add const-eval support for SIMD types, insert, and extract #64738
Changes from 8 commits
03ac54a
75d8199
f0bbd2b
e6239bb
3a6e96e
97ce904
02b3234
5976674
e74a268
e1cf0a1
02bfbf9
5ecb7eb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't even look at the actual "operand", right? It is just a layout function?
Then it (a) should be mixed up with all the other
read_*
methods as it is very different, and (b) shouldn't even be called "read" as it doesn't read from memory.I am not sure what the best place is for such a method, but it is not
operand.rs
. Sounds more like aTyLayout
method to me?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason why this is not using the element count from
Abi::Vector
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Uh, why this? Instead of throwing out this check entirely, you could have just added platform intrinsics to the whitelist.