Rollup of 5 pull requests #66218
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #66218
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Having a function `to_usize` that does not return a usize is somewhat confusing
Transition future compat lints to {ERROR, DENY} - Take 2
Follow up to rust-lang#63247 implementing rust-lang#63247 (comment).
- `legacy_ctor_visibility` (ERROR) -- closes rust-lang#39207
- `legacy_directory_ownership` (ERROR) -- closes rust-lang#37872
- `safe_extern_static` (ERROR) -- closes rust-lang#36247
- `parenthesized_params_in_types_and_modules` (ERROR) -- closes rust-lang#42238
- `duplicate_macro_exports` (ERROR)
- `nested_impl_trait` (ERROR) -- closes rust-lang#59014
- `ill_formed_attribute_input` (DENY) -- transitions rust-lang#57571
- `patterns_in_fns_without_body` (DENY) -- transitions rust-lang#35203
r? @varkor
cc @petrochenkov
rename Memory::get methods to get_raw to indicate their unchecked nature Some recent Miri PRs started using these methods when they should not; this should discourage their use. In fact we could make these methods private to the `interp` module as far as Miri is concerned -- with the exception of the `uninit` intrinsic which will hopefully go away soon. @bjorn3 @oli-obk does priroda need these methods? It would be great to be able to seal them away.
miri: Rename to_{u,i}size to to_machine_{u,i}size
Having a function `to_usize` that does not return a (host) usize is somewhat confusing, so let's rename it.
r? @oli-obk
Update rustc-guide r? @ehuss fix rust-lang#66144
`MethodSig` -> `FnSig` & Use it in `ItemKind::Fn` In both AST & HIR, rename `MethodSig` to `FnSig` and then proceed to use it in `ItemKind::Fn` so that the overall structure is more regular. r? @davidtwco
|
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 628baee has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 628baee with merge 91c4c73ec734e7fa8690d310c8fbced98f011564... |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
MethodSig->FnSig& Use it inItemKind::Fn#66188 (MethodSig->FnSig& Use it inItemKind::Fn)Failed merges:
r? @ghost