Rollup of 9 pull requests #66421
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #66421
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rename * Error::iter_chain() -> Error::chain() * ErrorIter -> Chain Removed * Error::iter_sources() according to rust-lang#58520 Rationale: 1. Such iterators are helpful. They should better be stabilized sooner than later. 2. self should be included. It is easy to .skip(1) it. Not including self is harmful because it is harder to add self to the iterator than to remove it. 3. The chosen name should be telling and reflect the fact that self is included. `.chain()` was chosen because the iterator iterates over the chain of errors that is somehow included in self. 4. The resulting iterator is named `Chain` because the `error::Chain` is what we want to have.
The `Context` argument is currently smuggled through TLS for
async-generated futures. The current infrastructure is closure-based,
and results in an extra 6 stack frames when .awaiting an async-generated
future!
```
12: foo::async_b::{{closure}}
at src/main.rs:10
13: <std::future::GenFuture<T> as core::future::future::Future>::poll::{{closure}}
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:43
14: std::future::set_task_context
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:79
15: <std::future::GenFuture<T> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:43
16: std::future::poll_with_tls_context::{{closure}}
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:121
17: std::future::get_task_context
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:111
18: std::future::poll_with_tls_context
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:121
19: foo::async_a::{{closure}}
at src/main.rs:6
```
While the long (medium?) term solution is to remove the use of TLS
entirely, we can improve things a bit in the meantime. In particular,
this commit does 2 things:
1. `get_task_context` has been inlined into `poll_with_tls_context`,
removing 2 frames (16 and 17 above).
2. `set_task_context` now returns a guard type that resets the TLS
rather than taking a closure, removing 2 frames (13 and 14 above).
We can also remove frame 18 by removing `poll_with_tls_context` in favor
of a `get_task_context` function which returns a guard, but that
requires adjusting the code generated for .await, so I've left that off
for now.
rename Error::iter_chain() and remove Error::iter_sources() ~~Rename~~ * ~~Error::iter_chain() -> Error::chained()~~ * ~~Error::iter_sources() -> Error::ancestors()~~ * ~~ErrorIter -> Chained and Ancestors~~ according to rust-lang#58520 (comment) Tracker: rust-lang#58520 Edit: Rename * Error::iter_chain() -> Error::chained() * ErrorIter -> Chain So, it seems, that even Path::ancestors() includes itself. So, to avoid confusion and simplify it more, I reduced PR rust-lang#65557 to only have `chained` and `Chain`. Rationale: 1. Such iterators are helpful. They should better be stabilized sooner than later. 1. self should be included. It is easy to .skip(1) it. Not including self is harmful because it is harder to add self to the iterator than to remove it. 1. The chosen name should be telling and reflect the fact that self is included. `.chained()` was chosen in honor of error-chain and because the iterator iterates over the chain of errors that is somehow included in self. 1. The resulting iterator is named `Chain` because the `error::Chain` is what we want to have.
Push `ast::{ItemKind, ImplItemKind}::OpaqueTy` hack down into lowering
We currently have a hack in the form of `ast::{ItemKind, ImplItemKind}::OpaqueTy` which is constructed literally when you write `type Alias = impl Trait;` but not e.g. `type Alias = Vec<impl Trait>;`. Per rust-lang/rfcs#2515, this needs to change to allow `impl Trait` in nested positions. This PR achieves this change for the syntactic aspect but not the semantic one, which will require changes in lowering and def collection. In the interim, `TyKind::opaque_top_hack` is introduced to avoid knock-on changes in lowering, collection, and resolve. These hacks can then be removed and fixed one by one until the desired semantics are supported.
r? @varkor
…miri, r=oli-obk Remove cannot mutate statics in initializer of another static error r? @oli-obk This is just a refactoring. As the removed code itself said, it only a heuristic catching a few cases early instead of leaving it all to const eval. It's easy to work around the static check and then run into the miri-engine check.
Update mdbook. This brings in some important updates to fix some rendering issues in the books. In particular fixing hidden lines in code blocks, and some escaping issues. More details at https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md This also requires updating mdbook-linkcheck.
Do not ICE in `if` without `else` in `async fn` Fix rust-lang#66387.
Make a test compatible across python versions. Progress on rust-lang#65063 This PR allows this test to work on both python2 and python3, and it also allows `./x.py test` to fully complete on my system without python2 installed at all.
Remove some stack frames from `.async` calls
The `Context` argument is currently smuggled through TLS for
async-generated futures. The current infrastructure is closure-based,
and results in an extra 6 stack frames when .awaiting an async-generated
future!
```
12: foo::async_b::{{closure}}
at src/main.rs:10
13: <std::future::GenFuture<T> as core::future::future::Future>::poll::{{closure}}
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:43
14: std::future::set_task_context
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:79
15: <std::future::GenFuture<T> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:43
16: std::future::poll_with_tls_context::{{closure}}
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:121
17: std::future::get_task_context
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:111
18: std::future::poll_with_tls_context
at /rustc/4560ea788cb760f0a34127156c78e2552949f734/src/libstd/future.rs:121
19: foo::async_a::{{closure}}
at src/main.rs:6
```
While the long (medium?) term solution is to remove the use of TLS
entirely, we can improve things a bit in the meantime. In particular,
this commit does 2 things:
1. `get_task_context` has been inlined into `poll_with_tls_context`,
removing 2 frames (16 and 17 above).
2. `set_task_context` now returns a guard type that resets the TLS
rather than taking a closure, removing 2 frames (13 and 14 above).
We can also remove frame 18 by removing `poll_with_tls_context` in favor
of a `get_task_context` function which returns a guard, but that
requires adjusting the code generated for .await, so I've left that off
for now.
miri: helper methods for max values of machine's usize/isize We recently wanted this in Miri. r? @oli-obk
…msg, r=estebank Link to tracking issue in HIR const-check error code description This is a follow up to rust-lang#66170 that addresses [this comment](rust-lang#66170 (comment)). As an aside, the only other error code whose description uses the phrase "tracking issue" is `E0202`. We may want to come up with standards around this, especially since error codes are now centralized and easier to keep track of (thanks @GuillaumeGomez). r? @estebank (since they +1'ed the comment)
|
@bors r+ p=9 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit c029bc5 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit c029bc5 with merge 04406e825555bb2df08500301dec2ef9c22bbacc... |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
ast::{ItemKind, ImplItemKind}::OpaqueTyhack down into lowering #66197 (Pushast::{ItemKind, ImplItemKind}::OpaqueTyhack down into lowering)ifwithoutelseinasync fn#66391 (Do not ICE inifwithoutelseinasync fn).asynccalls #66398 (Remove some stack frames from.asynccalls)Failed merges:
r? @ghost