-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check break target availability when checking breaks with values #66863
Conversation
r? @cramertj (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
729b992
to
f8d5786
Compare
|
r=me with @Centril's nit fixed. |
Test renamed. |
@bors r=cramertj |
📌 Commit 06f85858e1e7b9c603a4b5ec79d12bb9dc00e335 has been approved by |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
@bors r- ^ |
Ahh, file name in stderr file needs to be updated ... |
Should be good to go now. Sorry for the noise. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 6857c93 has been approved by |
Check break target availability when checking breaks with values Fixes rust-lang#66702 I'll be adding a regression test.
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #66710 (weak-into-raw: Clarify some details in Safety) - #66863 (Check break target availability when checking breaks with values) - #67002 (Fix documentation of pattern for str::matches()) - #67005 (capitalize Rust) - #67010 (Accurately portray raw identifiers in error messages) - #67011 (Include a span in more `expected...found` notes) - #67044 (E0023: handle expected != tuple pattern type) - #67045 (rustc_parser: cleanup imports) - #67055 (Make const-qualification look at more `const fn`s) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Fixes #66702
I'll be adding a regression test.