-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Work around a resolve bug in const prop #67631
Conversation
@bors r+ Thanks! |
📌 Commit 652cec1 has been approved by |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 3ab0663 has been approved by |
Confirmed that this will unblock #67137. Thank you!!! |
…sleywiser Work around a resolve bug in const prop r? @wesleywiser @anp This isn't exposed right now, but further changes to rustc may start causing bugs without this.
…sleywiser Work around a resolve bug in const prop r? @wesleywiser @anp This isn't exposed right now, but further changes to rustc may start causing bugs without this.
@bors r- |
Let's not do the hack, since @wesleywiser has a real fix |
We only want to return specializations when `Reveal::All` is passed, not when `Reveal::UserFacing` is. Resolving this fixes several issues with the `ConstProp`, `SimplifyBranches`, and `Inline` MIR optimization passes. Fixes rust-lang#66901
Ping on #67662 (comment):
|
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 3ab0663 has been approved by |
@bors r- I still want to do the warning thing |
3ab0663
to
5fd8abd
Compare
I added one more commit @wesleywiser It should permit #67137 to not cause a breaking change related to diverging constants, and additionally give us new |
Confirmed that this gets my test passing! |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 5fd8abd has been approved by |
…sleywiser Work around a resolve bug in const prop r? @wesleywiser @anp This isn't exposed right now, but further changes to rustc may start causing bugs without this.
Work around a resolve bug in const prop r? @wesleywiser @anp This isn't exposed right now, but further changes to rustc may start causing bugs without this.
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Is this 1% regression (5% on ctfe) expected? |
Looks like we're potentially calling |
But only in the |
|
Add some regression tests Closes rust-lang#64848 (fixed by rust-lang#67631) Closes rust-lang#65918 (ICE is hidden by rust-lang#67000, no longer ICE) Closes rust-lang#66473 (fixed by rust-lang#68084) Closes rust-lang#67550 (set mir-opt-level to 3) r? @Centril
r? @wesleywiser @anp
This isn't exposed right now, but further changes to rustc may start causing bugs without this.