-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation #68223
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit d43615f has been approved by |
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
GitHub has broke spacing in the last commit, you should make is as a fixup to the previous one. |
It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. Co-Authored-By: Mateusz Mikuła <mati865@users.noreply.github.com>
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 33bc9ef has been approved by |
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #67780 (Move some queries from rustc::ty to librustc_ty.) - #68096 (Clean up some diagnostics by making them more consistent) - #68223 (Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation) - #68265 (Fix some issue numbers of unstable features) - #68266 (Changed docs for f32 and f64.) Failed merges: - #68204 (Use named fields for `{ast,hir}::ItemKind::Impl`) r? @ghost
It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is
.6
not.4
)