Hide niches under UnsafeCell #68491
Merged
Hide niches under UnsafeCell #68491
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @zackmdavis (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
pnkfelix
commented
Jan 23, 2020
|
Was the choice of |
We did discuss it at the relevant lang team meeting. I think it is fair to say that no one there was a strong champion of the I nonetheless went with it. It is more readily adaptable if we discover other cases that should be treated like this. It is also more flexible: for example, if we decide that we want #[lang = "unsafe_cell"]
#[repr(transparent)]
struct UnsafeCellWithExposedNiche<T: ?Sized> {
value: T,
}
#[repr(transparent)]
#[repr(no_niche)]
pub struct UnsafeCell<T: ?Sized> {
value: UnsafeCellWithExposedNiche<T>,
}
#[repr(transparent)]
pub struct Cell<T: ?Sized> {
value: UnsafeCellWithExposedNiche<T>,
} |
oli-obk
approved these changes
Jan 25, 2020
|
I didn't give a super detailed review, but this looks good to me. I think that having |
eddyb
reviewed
Jan 27, 2020
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit c29be616278e583b76d8aa2d486585ae8112c1c2 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
(I lost the race with PR #68122; I'll rebase atop current master and update the test to remove |
pnkfelix
force-pushed
the
hide-niches-under-unsafe-cell
branch
2 times, most recently
from
64e541b to
5649128
Compare
|
@bors r=oli |
|
📌 Commit 56491287a37cbd684c341c8c0d982ac215ff9dfc has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
👉 "who's got two thumbs and thought 'surely nothing bad could happen if I just change the issue number in the feature meta-data to point at this PR rather than the issue, and move the meta-data record to a more appropriate spot in the list!' ...? This guy!" 👈 |
|
@pnkfelix I think I would prefer to have a true tracking issue, myself, versus pointing to this PR. It'd be great to link to (e.g.) the write-up that I did, the original issue, and to give some context about how this mechanism is rustc-internal and not expected to be stabilized. |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
@nikomatsakis The standard approach to internal feature gates is to put them in the "internal feature gates" section without a tracking issue: rust/src/librustc_feature/active.rs Lines 96 to 98 in b181835 |
|
⌛ Testing commit ea11b244d9793c9c7a2bcf61e95ea0f7e9aed6ec with merge 483c481cc8cd6bad32fedc84cd407fbf72f60149... |
|
💥 Test timed out |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #68933) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
pnkfelix
added
S-waiting-on-author
This repr-hint makes a struct/enum hide any niche within from its surrounding type-construction context. It is meant (at least initially) as an implementation detail for resolving issue 68303. We will not stabilize the repr-hint unless someone finds motivation for doing so. (So, declaration of `no_niche` feature lives in section of file where other internal implementation details are grouped, and deliberately leaves out the tracking issue number.) incorporated review feedback, and fixed post-rebase.
pnkfelix
force-pushed
the
hide-niches-under-unsafe-cell
branch
from
ea11b24 to
1b12232
Compare
|
@bors r=oli |
|
📌 Commit 1b12232 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors p=1 |
This was referenced Feb 11, 2020
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hide any niche of T from type-construction context of
UnsafeCell<T>.Fix #68303
Fix #68206