-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test failure of unchecked arithmetic intrinsics in const eval #68937
Test failure of unchecked arithmetic intrinsics in const eval #68937
Conversation
Any reason you used half a dozen different files as opposed to putting them all into the same file? |
|
b7f8065
to
8db5d55
Compare
Yeah, Miri stops on the first error (not sure what else an interpreter could possibly do). rustc just gives up for that particular |
8db5d55
to
ee52fe6
Compare
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit ee52fe6 has been approved by |
…-test, r=RalfJung Test failure of unchecked arithmetic intrinsics in const eval Test that the unchecked arithmetic intrinsics that were made unstably const in rust-lang#68809 emit an error during const-eval if given invalid input. Addresses [this comment](rust-lang#68809 (comment)). r? @RalfJung
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #67695 (Added dyn and true keyword docs) - #68487 ([experiment] Support linking from a .rlink file) - #68554 (Split lang_items to crates `rustc_hir` and `rustc_passes`.) - #68937 (Test failure of unchecked arithmetic intrinsics in const eval) - #68947 (Python script PEP8 style guide space formatting and minor Python source cleanup) - #68999 (remove dependency on itertools) - #69026 (Remove common usage pattern from `AllocRef`) - #69027 (Add missing `_zeroed` varants to `AllocRef`) - #69058 (Preparation for allocator aware `Box`) - #69070 (Add self to .mailmap) - #69077 (Fix outdated doc comment.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Test that the unchecked arithmetic intrinsics that were made unstably const in #68809 emit an error during const-eval if given invalid input.
Addresses this comment.
r? @RalfJung