Change "method" to "associated function" #69498

mark-i-m · 2020-02-26T22:52:37Z

I'm opening this mostly as a test to see what the diagnostic changes would be. It seems that this makes them somewhat more verbose, and I'm not sure it's worth it...

The relevant changes are the last two commits (it is rebased on top of #67742)

eddyb · 2020-02-26T22:55:32Z

Can you open a PR to fix #60163 without changing diagnostics?
Then we can separately do the diagnostic changes.

src/librustc/hir/map/mod.rs

src/librustc_hir/def.rs

src/test/ui/suggestions/suggest-methods.stderr

bjorn3 · 2020-02-28T20:34:46Z

To me a method is a special kind of associated function which takes a self parameter.

mark-i-m · 2020-03-03T17:47:59Z

@bjorn3 I agree, but the compiler doesn't currently make a distinction iiuc

bjorn3 · 2020-03-03T18:03:16Z

It would be nice if the error messages do make the distinction.

mark-i-m · 2020-03-03T18:55:52Z

Rebased over #69674

@rustbot modify labels: -S-waiting-on-review +S-blocked

Centril · 2020-03-03T21:37:27Z

It would be nice if the error messages do make the distinction.

I think error messages should only make the distinction where it actually matters. Otherwise, you have to scan for self in many places where it is semantically irrelevant whether self is there or not.

@eddyb

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

@eddyb

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

@eddyb

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

@eddyb

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

bors · 2020-03-08T14:54:47Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #69822) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@eddyb

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

mark-i-m · 2020-03-12T20:48:20Z

@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-blocked

matthewjasper · 2020-03-13T21:26:03Z

@bors r+
cc @rust-lang/wg-diagnostics

bors · 2020-03-13T21:26:05Z

📌 Commit b6518f0 has been approved by matthewjasper

@matthewjasper

…sper Change "method" to "associated function" r? @matthewjasper cc @Centril @eddyb rust-lang#67742 I'm opening this mostly as a test to see what the diagnostic changes would be. It seems that this makes them somewhat more verbose, and I'm not sure it's worth it... The relevant changes are the last two commits (it is rebased on top of rust-lang#67742)

@matthewjasper

…sper Change "method" to "associated function" r? @matthewjasper cc @Centril @eddyb rust-lang#67742 I'm opening this mostly as a test to see what the diagnostic changes would be. It seems that this makes them somewhat more verbose, and I'm not sure it's worth it... The relevant changes are the last two commits (it is rebased on top of rust-lang#67742)

@ghost

Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #69357 (Emit 1-based column numbers in debuginfo) - #69471 (Remove `sip::Hasher::short_write`.) - #69498 (Change "method" to "associated function") - #69967 (Remove a few `Rc`s from RegionInferenceCtxt) - #69987 (Add self to .mailmap) - #69991 (fix E0117 message out of sync) - #69993 (Add long error explanation for E0693) Failed merges: r? @ghost

@ghost

Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #69357 (Emit 1-based column numbers in debuginfo) - #69471 (Remove `sip::Hasher::short_write`.) - #69498 (Change "method" to "associated function") - #69967 (Remove a few `Rc`s from RegionInferenceCtxt) - #69987 (Add self to .mailmap) - #69991 (fix E0117 message out of sync) - #69993 (Add long error explanation for E0693) Failed merges: r? @ghost

estebank · 2020-03-15T18:26:33Z

It would be nice if the error messages do make the distinction.

I think error messages should only make the distinction where it actually matters. Otherwise, you have to scan for self in many places where it is semantically irrelevant whether self is there or not.

I disagree, I think it makes it much easier to teach the concepts if we are consistent in calling associated functions with self parameters "methods". I've seen this confusion play out many times and it is our responsibility to reduce "induced" confusion.

mark-i-m · 2020-03-15T18:30:26Z

I guess I've personally experienced the opposite... in this case, I always used to here "associated X" and not really know what it meant because e.g. associated fn where inconsistently referred to as methods, functions, or assoc functions. Picking one and sticking to it would be good.

On the other hand, I think the main point in favor of method is that it is the terminology used by most other languages (e.g. java, c++).

Centril · 2020-03-15T18:33:33Z

Java also has the concept of "static method", which is our notion of an associated method without self, so that adds more to the confusion. Meanwhile, Haskell calls any function in a type class "method".

@eddyb

Replace some desc logic in librustc_lint with article_and_desc r? @eddyb @Centril @matthewjasper Followup to rust-lang#69674 Blocked on rust-lang#69498

@eddyb

Replace some desc logic in librustc_lint with article_and_desc r? @eddyb @Centril @matthewjasper Followup to rust-lang#69674 Blocked on rust-lang#69498

@eddyb

Replace some desc logic in librustc_lint with article_and_desc r? @eddyb @Centril @matthewjasper Followup to rust-lang#69674 Blocked on rust-lang#69498

rust-highfive assigned matthewjasper Feb 26, 2020

Centril reviewed Feb 26, 2020

View reviewed changes

src/librustc/hir/map/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

eddyb reviewed Feb 26, 2020

View reviewed changes

src/librustc_hir/def.rs Show resolved Hide resolved

Centril reviewed Feb 26, 2020

View reviewed changes

src/test/ui/suggestions/suggest-methods.stderr Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

mark-i-m mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2020

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method #69674

Merged

mark-i-m force-pushed the describe-it-2 branch from 90d7531 to 1866043 Compare March 3, 2020 18:55

rustbot added the S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label Mar 3, 2020

mark-i-m force-pushed the describe-it-2 branch from 1866043 to 99586db Compare March 5, 2020 03:03

JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2020

Rollup merge of rust-lang#69674 - mark-i-m:assoc-fn, r=Centril

210d693

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

mark-i-m mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2020

Replace some desc logic in librustc_lint with article_and_desc #69740

Merged

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020

Rollup merge of rust-lang#69674 - mark-i-m:assoc-fn, r=Centril

19272a0

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020

Rollup merge of rust-lang#69674 - mark-i-m:assoc-fn, r=Centril

ed6ecf6

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2020

Rollup merge of rust-lang#69674 - mark-i-m:assoc-fn, r=Centril

e3def0e

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020

Rollup merge of rust-lang#69674 - mark-i-m:assoc-fn, r=matthewjasper

9bc7386

Rename DefKind::Method and TraitItemKind::Method r? @eddyb, @Centril, or @matthewjasper cc rust-lang#69498 rust-lang#60163

mark-i-m added 2 commits March 12, 2020 15:46

change method -> associated function

c8b527e

update tests

b6518f0

mark-i-m force-pushed the describe-it-2 branch from 99586db to b6518f0 Compare March 12, 2020 20:48

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels Mar 12, 2020

bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 13, 2020

bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 13, 2020

JohnTitor mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2020

Rollup of 8 pull requests #69996

Closed

Dylan-DPC-zz mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2020

Rollup of 7 pull requests #70008

Closed

Dylan-DPC-zz mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2020

Rollup of 7 pull requests #70016

Merged

bors merged commit f40272c into rust-lang:master Mar 15, 2020

mark-i-m deleted the describe-it-2 branch March 15, 2020 16:16

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Change "method" to "associated function" #69498

Change "method" to "associated function" #69498

mark-i-m commented Feb 26, 2020

eddyb commented Feb 26, 2020

bjorn3 commented Feb 28, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 3, 2020

bjorn3 commented Mar 3, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 3, 2020

Centril commented Mar 3, 2020

bors commented Mar 8, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 12, 2020

matthewjasper commented Mar 13, 2020

bors commented Mar 13, 2020

estebank commented Mar 15, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 15, 2020

Centril commented Mar 15, 2020

Change "method" to "associated function" #69498

Change "method" to "associated function" #69498

Conversation

mark-i-m commented Feb 26, 2020

eddyb commented Feb 26, 2020

bjorn3 commented Feb 28, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 3, 2020

bjorn3 commented Mar 3, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 3, 2020

Centril commented Mar 3, 2020

bors commented Mar 8, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 12, 2020

matthewjasper commented Mar 13, 2020

bors commented Mar 13, 2020

estebank commented Mar 15, 2020

mark-i-m commented Mar 15, 2020

Centril commented Mar 15, 2020