Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Whitelist #[allow_internal_unstable] #72713

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2020
Merged

Whitelist #[allow_internal_unstable] #72713

merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2020

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

This should hopefully work around #65023, which currently makes almost every bootstrap fail for me.

This should hopefully work around #65023, which currently makes almost every bootstrap fail for me.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @ecstatic-morse

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 28, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Gah. Would be great to fix these lints to work properly. Approving since it seems like a low-loss and quite harmful to productivity change.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 29, 2020

📌 Commit d4ef174 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 29, 2020
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ pub const BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTES: &[BuiltinAttribute] = &[
// FIXME(#14407)
ungated!(rustc_const_stable, Whitelisted, template!(List: r#"feature = "name""#)),
gated!(
allow_internal_unstable, Normal, template!(Word, List: "feat1, feat2, ..."),
allow_internal_unstable, Whitelisted, template!(Word, List: "feat1, feat2, ..."),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be a good idea to add a FIXME mentioning that this should eventually be changed back to Normal.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think in the long term Whitelisted should just not exist, right? But r=me with such a comment too.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#71633 (Impl Error for Infallible)
 - rust-lang#71843 (Tweak and stabilize AtomicN::fetch_update)
 - rust-lang#72288 (Stabilization of weak-into-raw)
 - rust-lang#72324 (Stabilize AtomicN::fetch_min and AtomicN::fetch_max)
 - rust-lang#72452 (Clarified the documentation for Formatter::precision)
 - rust-lang#72495 (Improve E0601 explanation)
 - rust-lang#72534 (Improve missing `@` in slice binding pattern diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#72547 (Added a codegen test for a recent optimization for overflow-checks=on)
 - rust-lang#72711 (remove redundant `mk_const`)
 - rust-lang#72713 (Whitelist #[allow_internal_unstable])
 - rust-lang#72720 (Clarify the documentation of `take`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 5207428 into master May 29, 2020
@oli-obk oli-obk deleted the jonas-schievink-patch-2 branch May 31, 2020 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants