Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

older toolchains not valid anymore #74521

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

older toolchains not valid anymore #74521

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2020

Conversation

andjo403
Copy link
Contributor

with the change to llvm 10 the parameter
LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN do not do anything as min and soft error is the same.
see https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project/blob/86b120e6f302d39cd6973b6391fb299d7bc22122/llvm/cmake/modules/CheckCompilerVersion.cmake

with the change to llvm 10 the parameter
LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN do not do any thing as
min and soft error is the same.
see https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project/blob/86b120e6f302d39cd6973b6391fb299d7bc22122/llvm/cmake/modules/CheckCompilerVersion.cmake
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 19, 2020
@Muirrum Muirrum added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 6, 2020
Copy link
Member

@JohnTitor JohnTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

r? @Mark-Simulacrum and cc @nikic as you're familiar with LLVM and left a comment in #63630.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r? @nikic or @cuviper

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 11, 2020

@bors r+ rollup=always

The allow-old-toolchain config.toml option still exists in case this becomes relevant again in the future, but there's no reason to have prominent documentation in README for it.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 11, 2020

📌 Commit 30659cd has been approved by nikic

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 11, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2020
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#74521 (older toolchains not valid anymore)
 - rust-lang#74960 (Fix regionck failure when converting Index to IndexMut)
 - rust-lang#75234 (Update asm! documentation in unstable book)
 - rust-lang#75368 (Move to doc links inside the prelude)
 - rust-lang#75371 (Move to doc links inside std/time.rs)
 - rust-lang#75394 (Add a function to `TyCtxt` for computing an `Allocation` for a `static` item's initializer)
 - rust-lang#75395 (Switch to intra-doc links in library/std/src/os/*/fs.rs)
 - rust-lang#75422 (Accept more safety comments)
 - rust-lang#75424 (fix wrong word in documentation)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 7e503a0 into rust-lang:master Aug 12, 2020
@andjo403 andjo403 deleted the readme branch February 28, 2021 09:28
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants