Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix generating rustc docs with non-default lib directory. #76717

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2020

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Sep 14, 2020

If libdir is set in config.toml, then the tool to generate the rustc docs was unable to run rustc because it could not find the shared libraries. The solution is to set the dylib search path to include the libdir.

I changed the API of add_rustc_lib_path to take Command instead of Cargo to try to share the code in several places. This is how it worked before #64316, and I think this still retains the spirit of that change.

Fixes #76702

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 14, 2020
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me

src/tools/lint-docs/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Some errors, like if rustc is broken, or dylib search path is wrong,
will only display non-JSON errors. Show those, too, to make it easier to
debug a problem.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Even better! :)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 14, 2020

📌 Commit 9dad908 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 14, 2020
@jyn514 jyn514 added the T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) label Sep 15, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2020
…-Simulacrum

Fix generating rustc docs with non-default lib directory.

If `libdir` is set in `config.toml`, then the tool to generate the rustc docs was unable to run `rustc` because it could not find the shared libraries. The solution is to set the dylib search path to include the libdir.

I changed the API of `add_rustc_lib_path` to take `Command` instead of `Cargo` to try to share the code in several places. This is how it worked before rust-lang#64316, and I think this still retains the spirit of that change.

Fixes rust-lang#76702
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2020
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#76669 (Prefer asm! over llvm_asm! in core)
 - rust-lang#76675 (Small improvements to asm documentation)
 - rust-lang#76681 (remove orphaned files)
 - rust-lang#76694 (Introduce a PartitioningCx struct)
 - rust-lang#76695 (fix syntax error in suggesting generic constraint in trait parameter)
 - rust-lang#76699 (improve const infer error)
 - rust-lang#76707 (Simplify iter flatten struct doc)
 - rust-lang#76710 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#76714 (Small docs improvements)
 - rust-lang#76717 (Fix generating rustc docs with non-default lib directory.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
@bors bors merged commit f631293 into rust-lang:master Sep 16, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.48.0 milestone Sep 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lint docs failed to build
6 participants