Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add type definitions for rustdoc JSON backend #76900

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

HeroicKatora
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed as a first step of #76578 add serde-deriving type definitions describing the structure.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @ollie27

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 19, 2020
@HeroicKatora

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment
@HeroicKatora
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @Manishearth

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned Manishearth and unassigned ollie27 Sep 19, 2020
@jyn514 jyn514 added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 19, 2020
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Sep 19, 2020

@HeroicKatora how does this interact with #75114 ?

@HeroicKatora
Copy link
Contributor Author

I overlooked that it already had its own type definitions, the tracking issue could use some updates then on the open PR? This was just porting some work some for a potential consumer of the output (oberien/heradoc#154) so not tagic :)

@HeroicKatora HeroicKatora deleted the rustdoc-json branch September 20, 2020 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants