Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #77712

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

ssomers and others added 17 commits October 3, 2020 21:18
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
`DirEntry` contains a `ReadDir` handle, which used to just be a wrapper
on `Arc<InnerReadDir>`. Commit af75314 added `end_of_stream: bool`
which is not needed by `DirEntry`, but adds 8 bytes after padding. We
can let `DirEntry` have an `Arc<InnerReadDir>` directly to avoid that.
…t, r=Mark-Simulacrum

BTreeMap: comment why drain_filter's size_hint is somewhat pessimistic

The `size_hint` of the `DrainFilter` iterator doesn't adjust as you iterate. This hardly seems important to me, but there has been a comparable PR rust-lang#64383 in the past. I guess a scenario is that you first iterate half the map manually and keep most of the key/value pairs in the map, and then tell the predicate to drain most of the key/value pairs and `.collect` the iterator over the remaining half of the map.

I am totally ambivalent whether this is better or not.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum
suggest `MAX` constant if -1 is assigned to unsigned type

Fixes rust-lang#76413.
Fixes rust-lang#77416.
(docs): make mutex error comment consistent with codebase

Although exceptionally minor, I found this stands out from other error reporting language used in doc comments. With the existence of the `failure` crate, I suppose this could be slightly ambiguous. In any case, this change brings the particular comment into a consistent state with other mentions of returning errors.
…-object-safe, r=Aaron1011

Add compile fail test for issue 27675

A recently merged PR (rust-lang#73905) strengthened the checks on bounds of associated items. This rejects the attack path of rust-lang#27675 which consisted of constructing a `dyn Trait<Item=T>` where `T` would not fulfill the bounds required on `Item` of the `Trait` behind the dyn object.

This regression test, extracted from [the weaponized instance](rust-lang#27675 (comment)), checks that this is rejected.
Remove unnecessary lamda on emitter map.
unix/vxworks: make DirEntry slightly smaller

`DirEntry` contains a `ReadDir` handle, which used to just be a wrapper
on `Arc<InnerReadDir>`. Commit af75314 added `end_of_stream: bool`
which is not needed by `DirEntry`, but adds 8 bytes after padding. We
can let `DirEntry` have an `Arc<InnerReadDir>` directly to avoid that.
…crum

Make `max_log_info` easily greppable (for figuring out why debug logging is disabled)

Follow-up to rust-lang#77678 (comment). I'll make a PR to the dev-guide shortly changing `debug = true` to `debug-logging = true` and using this text.

Ideally wouldn't be merged before rust-lang#77678, but it practice it won't hurt anything.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link
Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 8, 2020

📌 Commit 4b99066 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 8, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 8, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 4b99066 with merge f26192a2b065ce753fb42c88a2f41c6ef32a5d0f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 8, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 8, 2020
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz deleted the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz restored the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz deleted the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz restored the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz deleted the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz restored the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz deleted the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz restored the rollup-5k2bx6c branch October 9, 2020 00:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.