Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add macro test for min-const-generics #78912

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

JulianKnodt
Copy link
Contributor

Adds a test which uses a macro inside a block for a const-expression, as per #78433

r? @lcnr

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 9, 2020

let _ok = Example::<{ external_macro!() }>;

let _fail = Example::<external_macro!()>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's interesting that this fails 🤔 cc @petrochenkov @varkor what would be needed to get this to work?
Might be good to open an separate issue for this.

Would this also need an GenericArg::Ambiguous variant in the AST?

Copy link
Member

@varkor varkor Nov 10, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

external_macro!() is not a literal or block expression, so it's being parsed as a type argument. This is behaving as expected.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but if the macro itself returns a block, it doesn't seem that that gets parsed as a const. It's fine if this is the intended behavior, just a bit surprising

@JulianKnodt JulianKnodt force-pushed the mcg_macro branch 2 times, most recently from c036a19 to 504f435 Compare November 10, 2020 00:15
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Nov 10, 2020

thanks

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 10, 2020

📌 Commit 504f435df041c565847b6b0e4d06df48431fc9ad has been approved by lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 10, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 10, 2020
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Nov 10, 2020

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 10, 2020
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Nov 10, 2020

👍

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 10, 2020

📌 Commit 857dd8b has been approved by lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 10, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 10, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
…as-schievink

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#76765 (Make it more clear what an about async fn's returns when referring to what it returns)
 - rust-lang#78574 (Use check-pass instead of build-pass in regions ui test suite)
 - rust-lang#78669 (Use check-pass instead of build-pass in some consts ui test suits)
 - rust-lang#78847 (Assert that a return place is not used for indexing during integration)
 - rust-lang#78854 (Workaround for "could not fully normalize" ICE )
 - rust-lang#78875 (rustc_target: Further cleanup use of target options)
 - rust-lang#78887 (Add comments to explain memory usage optimization)
 - rust-lang#78890 (comment attribution fix)
 - rust-lang#78896 (Clarified description of write! macro)
 - rust-lang#78897 (Add missing newline to error message of the default OOM hook)
 - rust-lang#78898 (add regression test for rust-lang#78892)
 - rust-lang#78908 ((rustdoc) [src] link for types defined by macros shows invocation, not defintion)
 - rust-lang#78910 (Fix links to stabilized versions of some intrinsics)
 - rust-lang#78912 (Add macro test for min-const-generics)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit fa4d0f2 into rust-lang:master Nov 11, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.49.0 milestone Nov 11, 2020
@lcnr lcnr added the F-const_generics `#![feature(const_generics)]` label Nov 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
F-const_generics `#![feature(const_generics)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants