-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #79252
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #79252
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This section documents the exploit mitigations applicable to the Rust compiler when building programs for the Linux operating system on the AMD64 architecture and equivalent.
This adds `rust.description` to the config as a descriptive string to be appended to `rustc --version` output, which is also used in places like debuginfo `DW_AT_producer`. This may be useful for supplementary build information, like distro-specific package versions. For example, in Fedora 33, `gcc --version` outputs: gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20201016 (Red Hat 10.2.1-6) With this change, we can add similar vendor info to `rustc --version`.
This commit updates the `library/backtrace` submodule which primarily pulls in support for split-debuginfo on macOS, avoiding the need for `dsymutil` to get run to get line numbers and filenames in backtraces.
…ns, r=steveklabnik Add exploit mitigations chapter to the rustc book This section documents the exploit mitigations applicable to the Rust compiler when building programs for the Linux operating system on the AMD64 architecture and equivalent. This was done for a project I'm currently working on, and I hope it'll also be helpful to others.
…=Dylan-DPC lint: Do not provide suggestions for non standard characters Fixes rust-lang#77273 Only provide suggestions if the case-fixed result is different than the original.
clarify rules for ZST Boxes LLVM's rules around `getelementptr inbounds` with offset 0 are a bit annoying, and as a consequence we have no choice but say that a `Box<()>` pointing to previously allocated memory that has since been freed is UB. Clarify the docs to reflect this. This is based on conversations on the LLVM mailing list. * Here's my initial mail: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130452.html * The first email of the March part of that thread: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/130831.html * First email of the April part: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131693.html The conclusion for me at least was that `getelementptr inbounds` with offset 0 is *not* the identity function, but can sometimes return `poison` even when the input is a regular pointer -- specifically, it returns `poison` when this pointer points into something that LLVM "knows has been deallocated", i.e., a former LLVM-managed allocation. It is however the identity function on pointers obtained by casting integers. Note that there [are formal proposals](https://people.mpi-sws.org/~jung/twinsem/twinsem.pdf) for LLVM semantics where `getelementptr inbounds` with offset 0 isn't quite the identity function but never returns `poison` (it affects the provenance of the pointer but in a way that doesn't matter if this pointer is never used for memory accesses), and indeed this is likely necessary to consistently describe LLVM semantics. But with the informal LLVM LangRef that we have right now, and with LLVM devs insisting otherwise, it seems unwise to rely on this.
rustc_expand: Mark inner `#![test]` attributes as soft-unstable Custom inner attributes are feature gated (rust-lang#54726) except for attributes having name `test` literally, which are not gated for historical reasons. `#![test]` is an inner proc macro attribute, so it has all the issues described in rust-lang#54726 too. This PR gates it with the `soft_unstable` lint.
…mulacrum x.py: allow a custom string appended to the version This adds `rust.description` to the config as a descriptive string to be appended to `rustc --version` output, which is also used in places like debuginfo `DW_AT_producer`. This may be useful for supplementary build information, like distro-specific package versions. For example, in Fedora 33, `gcc --version` outputs: gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20201016 (Red Hat 10.2.1-6) With this change, we can add similar vendor info to `rustc --version`.
Add `core::slice::fill_with` Tracking issue rust-lang#79221. As suggested by `@m-ou-se` in rust-lang#70758 (comment) this implements `slice::fill_with` as a counterpart to `slice::fill`. This mirrors `Vec::resize` and `Vec::resize_with`. Thanks! r? `@m-ou-se`
…rk-Simulacrum std: Update the bactrace crate submodule This commit updates the `library/backtrace` submodule which primarily pulls in support for split-debuginfo on macOS, avoiding the need for `dsymutil` to get run to get line numbers and filenames in backtraces.
Direct RUSTC_LOG (tracing/log) output to stderr instead of stdout. Looks like this got missed in the initial implementation, AFAIK the old behavior was to output on stderr. (Hit this while trying to debug `rustc` running inside a build script which was only letting stderr through) r? `@oli-obk` cc `@davidbarsky` `@hawkw`
update miri Fixes rust-lang#79226 Cc `@rust-lang/miri` r? `@ghost`
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 4123fb5 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Nov 21, 2020
⌛ Testing commit 4123fb5 with merge 9793d6945e7976ae1d849524aa39e11b24eba26e... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Nov 21, 2020
#76858 failed on Apple. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
#![test]
attributes as soft-unstable #79003 (rustc_expand: Mark inner#![test]
attributes as soft-unstable)core::slice::fill_with
#79222 (Addcore::slice::fill_with
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup