-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename "stability" CSS class to "item-info" and combine document_stability
with document_short
#79340
Conversation
Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS themes. Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS. A change occurred in the Ayu theme. cc @Cldfire |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems reasonable to me - not sure 'item info' is the best possible name but it seems more clear than 'stability' at least.
document_item_info(w, cx, item, false, parent); | ||
document_full(w, item, cx, "", false); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are these separate? Are there cases when you want one but not the other?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, there isn't. Let's call document_item_info
inside document full. Great catch!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hum actually we can't really do that in a straightforward way because in some cases, we add the information on the parent. For example:
document_item_info(w, cx, item, is_hidden, Some(parent));
if show_def_docs {
document_full(w, item, cx, "", is_hidden);
}
And it's in multiple places. document_short
has the same "problem".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you pass in show_def_docs
as a parameter? Then it would have the same behavior, but make it hard to forget about document_item_info
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fine by me!
4436943
to
be0484b
Compare
So, in one case, |
document_stability
with document_short
Let's keep it as-is. @bors r+ |
📌 Commit be0484b has been approved by |
…jyn514 Rename "stability" CSS class to "item-info" and combine `document_stability` with `document_short` Follow-up of rust-lang#79300 The point of this PR is to make the CSS class more accurate since it's not only about stability anymore. r? `@jyn514`
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#79327 (Require allocator to be static for boxed `Pin`-API) - rust-lang#79340 (Rename "stability" CSS class to "item-info" and combine `document_stability` with `document_short`) - rust-lang#79363 (BTreeMap: try to enhance various comments) - rust-lang#79395 (Move ui if tests from top-level into `expr/if`) - rust-lang#79443 (Improve rustdoc JS tests error output) - rust-lang#79464 (Extend doc keyword feature by allowing any ident) - rust-lang#79484 (add enable-full-tools to freebsd builds to prevent occasional link er…) - rust-lang#79505 (Cleanup: shorter and faster code) - rust-lang#79514 (Add test for issue rust-lang#54121: order dependent trait bounds) - rust-lang#79516 (Remove unnecessary `mut` binding) - rust-lang#79528 (Fix a bootstrap comment) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Follow-up of #79300
The point of this PR is to make the CSS class more accurate since it's not only about stability anymore.
r? @jyn514