Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix docs formatting for thir::pattern::_match #79421

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2020

Conversation

camelid
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid commented Nov 25, 2020

They were being rendered all on one line.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 25, 2020
@camelid camelid added A-exhaustiveness-checking Relating to exhaustiveness / usefulness checking of patterns T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools labels Nov 25, 2020
@camelid camelid force-pushed the _match-docs-fmt branch 2 times, most recently from 2c70b38 to 954a9bf Compare November 25, 2020 21:12
A list was being rendered all on one line and there were other
formatting issues as well.
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 25, 2020

📌 Commit c5c70d4 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 25, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 26, 2020

⌛ Testing commit c5c70d4 with merge c36ad78b3a54240ed11fb24341e7b450ba51e85d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 26, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 26, 2020
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 26, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2020
…as-schievink

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#77758 (suggest turbofish syntax for uninferred const arguments)
 - rust-lang#79000 (Move lev_distance to rustc_ast, make non-generic)
 - rust-lang#79362 (Lower patterns before using the bound variable)
 - rust-lang#79365 (Upgrades the coverage map to Version 4)
 - rust-lang#79402 (Fix typos)
 - rust-lang#79412 (Clean up rustdoc tests by removing unnecessary features)
 - rust-lang#79413 (Fix persisted doctests on Windows / when using workspaces)
 - rust-lang#79420 (Fixes a word typo in librustdoc)
 - rust-lang#79421 (Fix docs formatting for `thir::pattern::_match`)
 - rust-lang#79428 (Fixup compiler docs)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 815d961 into rust-lang:master Nov 26, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 26, 2020
@camelid camelid deleted the _match-docs-fmt branch November 26, 2020 20:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools A-exhaustiveness-checking Relating to exhaustiveness / usefulness checking of patterns S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants