-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #81559
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #81559
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When the iterator nth() method was updated it was not in zip. Zip needs to implement nth() for the trusted length specialised implementation.
Change filesearch::get_or_default_sysroot() to check if sysroot is found using env::args().next() if rustc in argv[0] is a symlink; otherwise, or if it is not found, use env::current_exe() to imply sysroot. This makes the rustc binary able to locate Rust libraries in systems using content-addressable storage (CAS).
Reverts PR #80830 Fixes taiki-e/pin-project#312 We can have an arbitrary number of `None`-delimited group frames pushed on the stack due to proc-macro invocations, which can legally be exited. Attempting to account for this would add a lot of complexity for a tiny performance gain, so let's just use the original strategy.
- No Derefs in move closure, this will result in value behind a reference getting moved. - No projections are applied to raw pointers, since these require unsafe blocks. We capture them completely. Motivations for these are recorded here: https://hackmd.io/71qq-IOpTNqzMkPpAI1dVg?view
When `capture_disjoint_fields` is not enabled, checking if the root variable binding is mutable would suffice. However with the feature enabled, the captured place might be mutable because it dereferences a mutable reference. This PR computes the mutability of each capture after capture analysis in rustc_typeck. We store this in `ty::CapturedPlace` and then use `ty::CapturedPlace::mutability` in mir_build and borrow_check.
The `Deref` cycle checks added as part of #80653 were "unbalanced" in the sense that the main content code path checks for cycles _before_ descending, while the sidebar checks _after_. Checking _before_ is correct, so this changes the sidebar path to match the main content path.
refactor: removing custom nth Zip fn Noticed `super_nth()` that seems very similar to `nth()` in `iterator.rs`. If you look at `nth()` in `iterator.rs` before the commit `ecacc7534b6bf50205c37c89402565b82d95a257` `super_nth()` looks exactly the same as `fn nth()` in `iterator.rs`. I may be misunderstanding something, but I think `super_nth()` can just be removed.
Fix rustc sysroot in systems using CAS Change filesearch::get_or_default_sysroot() to check if sysroot is found using env::args().next() if rustc in argv[0] is a symlink; otherwise, or if it is not found, use env::current_exe() to imply sysroot. This makes the rustc binary able to locate Rust libraries in systems using content-addressable storage (CAS).
2229: Fix issues with move closures and mutability This PR fixes two issues when feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is used. 1. Can't mutate using a mutable reference 2. Move closures try to move value out through a reference. To do so, we 1. Compute the mutability of the capture and store it as part of the `CapturedPlace` that is written in TypeckResults 2. Restrict capture precision. Note this is temporary for now, to allow the feature to be used with move closures and ByValue captures and might change depending on discussions with the lang team. - No Derefs are captured for ByValue captures, since that will result in value behind a reference getting moved. - No projections are applied to raw pointers since these require unsafe blocks. We capture them completely. r? ``@nikomatsakis``
Add Box::downcast() for dyn Any + Send + Sync Looks like a plain omission, but unfortunately I just needed that in my code :)
Account for existing `_` field pattern when suggesting `..` Follow up to #80017.
…enkov Clone entire `TokenCursor` when collecting tokens Reverts PR #80830 Fixes taiki-e/pin-project#312 We can have an arbitrary number of `None`-delimited group frames pushed on the stack due to proc-macro invocations, which can legally be exited. Attempting to account for this would add a lot of complexity for a tiny performance gain, so let's just use the original strategy.
Optimize decimal formatting of 128-bit integers ## Description This PR optimizes the `udivmod_1e19` function, which is used for formatting 128-bit integers, based on the algorithm provided in \[1\]. This optimization improves performance of formatting 128-bit integers, especially on 64-bit architectures. It also slightly reduces the output binary size. ## Assembler comparison https://godbolt.org/z/YrG5zY ## Performance #### previous results ``` test fmt::write_u128_max ... bench: 552 ns/iter (+/- 4) test fmt::write_u128_min ... bench: 125 ns/iter (+/- 2) ``` #### new results ``` test fmt::write_u128_max ... bench: 205 ns/iter (+/- 13) test fmt::write_u128_min ... bench: 129 ns/iter (+/- 5) ``` ## Reference \[1\] T. Granlund and P. Montgomery, “Division by Invariant Integers Using Multiplication” in Proc. of the SIGPLAN94 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 1994, pp. 61–72
…omez Balance sidebar `Deref` cycle check with main content The `Deref` cycle checks added as part of #80653 were "unbalanced" in the sense that the main content code path checks for cycles _before_ descending, while the sidebar checks _after_. Checking _before_ is correct, so this changes the sidebar path to match the main content path. Fixes #81395 r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
…-schievink Replace predecessor with range in collections documentation Fixes #81548.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
📌 Commit de95341 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jan 30, 2021
⌛ Testing commit de95341 with merge b40b422794ae88ab33032278f70b4e905c91d659... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jan 30, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
_
field pattern when suggesting..
#81422 (Account for existing_
field pattern when suggesting..
)TokenCursor
when collecting tokens #81472 (Clone entireTokenCursor
when collecting tokens)Deref
cycle check with main content #81491 (Balance sidebarDeref
cycle check with main content)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup