Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rustdoc: Remove PrimitiveType::{to_url_str, as_str} #84466

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2021
Merged

rustdoc: Remove PrimitiveType::{to_url_str, as_str} #84466

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2021

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Apr 23, 2021

These can easily be rewritten in terms of as_sym, and this avoids bugs where the two get out of sync.

I don't expect this to have a perf impact, but I'll start a perf run just in case.

@jyn514 jyn514 added C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 23, 2021
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @ollie27

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 23, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 23, 2021

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 23, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 23, 2021

⌛ Trying commit c5219004c2a65b6c1986d34472084c461490fbac with merge db51f0d2969292fe15066b15efe6961d4a06df4e...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 23, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: db51f0d2969292fe15066b15efe6961d4a06df4e (db51f0d2969292fe15066b15efe6961d4a06df4e)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued db51f0d2969292fe15066b15efe6961d4a06df4e with parent 7f4afdf, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (db51f0d2969292fe15066b15efe6961d4a06df4e): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 23, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 23, 2021

Instruction count looks like noise. Max rss seems very slightly worse, but it's a noisy benchmark so it's hard to tell.

I don't have a strong preference either way on whether to land this.

@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 9, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented May 20, 2021

r? @GuillaumeGomez

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

It's fine, the fact that we have less code to maintain counterbalance the very small perf regression. Thanks!

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 20, 2021

📌 Commit c5219004c2a65b6c1986d34472084c461490fbac has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 20, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 20, 2021

⌛ Testing commit c5219004c2a65b6c1986d34472084c461490fbac with merge e5cc30b2b3aa59a36baea405cd51b2385571be48...

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

GuillaumeGomez commented May 20, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Good catch @petrochenkov !

@bors: r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 20, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 20, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 20, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jun 4, 2021

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 4, 2021

📌 Commit 5079744 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 4, 2021
@JohnTitor JohnTitor mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2021
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2021
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#86006 - JohnTitor:rollup-97iuoi3, r=JohnTitor
704934d 
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#83653 (Remove unused code from `rustc_data_structures::sync`)
 - rust-lang#84466 (rustdoc: Remove `PrimitiveType::{to_url_str, as_str}`)
 - rust-lang#84880 (Make match in `register_res` easier to read)
 - rust-lang#84942 (rustdoc: link to stable/beta docs consistently in documentation)
 - rust-lang#85853 (Warn against boxed DST in `improper_ctypes_definitions` lint)
 - rust-lang#85939 (Fix suggestion for removing &mut from &mut macro!().)
 - rust-lang#85966 (wasm: Make simd types passed via indirection again)
 - rust-lang#85979 (don't suggest unsized indirection in where-clauses)
 - rust-lang#85983 (Update to semver 1.0.3)
 - rust-lang#85988 (Note that `ninja = false` goes under `[llvm]`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 74c744e into rust-lang:master Jun 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone Jun 5, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the prim-str branch June 5, 2021 01:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@petrochenkov petrochenkov petrochenkov left review comments

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez approved these changes

Assignees

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez

Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.54.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
10 participants
@jyn514 @rust-highfive @rust-timer @bors @GuillaumeGomez @rust-log-analyzer @petrochenkov @JohnCSimon @ollie27 @rustbot