-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 12 pull requests #84473
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 12 pull requests #84473
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This switches from JS-generated toggles to using the HTML <details> tag for expanding and collapsing entries in the "Implementors" section.
Add missing information on what standard-library features are supported by the UEFI targets. All current UEFI targets (which is i686 and x86_64) only support no_std cross-compilations. `std` support has not been worked on and is unlikely to emerge anytime soon, due to the much restricted environment that UEFI provides.
On most From implementations, the docstring is attached to the function. This is also how people have been [recommended] to do it. Screenshots: * [before](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/115767662-323c5480-a35e-11eb-9918-98aba83e9183.png) * [after](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/115767675-35374500-a35e-11eb-964f-c28eeb6c807a.png) [recommended]: rust-lang#51430 (comment)
This was missed a while ago when support for proc-macro attributes was first added.
…, r=pnkfelix Improve diagnostic for when field is never read Related to (but does not close) rust-lang#81658 This completes the first step of ``@pnkfelix's`` [mentoring instructions](rust-lang#81658 (comment)) but does not actually improve the diagnostics (yet!). The two tests are heavily reduced versions of code from the original bug report. I've confirmed that the reduced `field-used-in-ffi` test [fails on nightly](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=f0862c89ddca028c55c20a5ed05e679a) but [passes on stable](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=f0862c89ddca028c55c20a5ed05e679a). This confirms that the regression is reproduced correctly. The `drop-only-field` test is a case that ``@pnkfelix`` mentioned in his mentoring instructions. It is not a regression, but will come in handy when we make the diagnostic smarter by looking at whether the field type implements `Drop`. Per the [rustc-dev-guide](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/tests/adding.html), each test includes a comment summarizing what it is about.
Add a suggestion when using a type alias instead of trait alias Fixes rust-lang#43913 r? ``````@estebank``````
… r=Amanieu Remove duplicated fn(Box<[T]>) -> Vec<T> `<[T]>::into_vec()` does the same thing as `Vec::from::<Box<[T]>>()`, so they can be implemented in terms of each other. This was the previous implementation of `Vec::from()`, but was changed in rust-lang#78461. I'm not sure what the rationale was for that change, but it seems preferable to maintain a single implementation.
…earth,Nemo157,GuillaumeGomez Use details tag for trait implementors. Part of rust-lang#83332 and following on from rust-lang#83337 and rust-lang#83355. This removes one category of JS-generated toggles (implementors), and replaces them with a `<details>` tag. This simplifies the JS, and fixes some bugs where things that were supposed to be hidden by the toggle were not hidden. Compare https://hoffman-andrews.com/rust/details-implementors/std/io/trait.Read.html#impl-Read vs https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/io/trait.Read.html#implementors. This introduces a `left: -23px` to put the toggle in the correct place, matching the current style for `.collapse-toggle`. It's worth noting this introduces a slight behavior change: since the entire line is now a `<summary>`, any part of the line is clickable. So for instance, in `impl Read for File`, clicking `impl` or `for` will collapse / expand the docs. Clicking `Read` or `File` still links to the appropriate documentation as before.
…=jonas-schievink ⬆️ rust-analyzer
Clean up .gitignore Categorizes entries in the `.gitignore` file. Other changes: - added `desktop.ini` (Windows equivalent of `.DS_Store`) - removed `.hg/` and `.hgignore`
Move `sys_common::poison` to `sync::poison` `sys_common` should not contain publicly exported types, only platform-independent abstractions on top of `sys`, which `sys_common::poison` is not. There is thus no reason for the module to not live under `sync`.
doc/platform-support: clarify UEFI support Add missing information on what standard-library features are supported by the UEFI targets. All current UEFI targets (which is i686 and x86_64) only support no_std cross-compilations. `std` support has not been worked on and is unlikely to emerge anytime soon, due to the much restricted environment that UEFI provides.
…=jsha Prevent control, shift and alt keys to make search input lose focus Part of rust-lang#84384. r? `@jsha`
…d-items-toggle, r=yaahc rustdoc: Get rid of "[+] show undocumented items" toggle on numeric From impls On most From implementations, the docstring is attached to the function. This is also how people have been [recommended] to do it. Screenshots: * [before](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/115767662-323c5480-a35e-11eb-9918-98aba83e9183.png) * [after](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/115767675-35374500-a35e-11eb-964f-c28eeb6c807a.png) [recommended]: rust-lang#51430 (comment)
Fix ICE if original_span(fn_sig) returns a span not in body sourcefile Fixes: rust-lang#84421 r? `@tmandry` fyi: `@wesleywiser` `@sdroege` `@rajivshah3`
rustdoc: Get rid of `clean::TypeKind` It does exactly the same thing as ItemType.
@bors: r+ p=12 rollup=never |
📌 Commit f75bb0c has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 23, 2021
⌛ Testing commit f75bb0c with merge a291e9258e0373f9672e0b4e846e5fe34cd3a241... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 23, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
sys_common::poison
tosync::poison
#84387 (Movesys_common::poison
tosync::poison
)clean::TypeKind
#84464 (rustdoc: Get rid ofclean::TypeKind
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup