Remove must_use from ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES #86277
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jsha
added
T-rustdoc
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value. Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods.
|
@bors r+ Still not sure if I 100% agree with this but I don't mind removing this. If folks complain we can put it back. |
|
📌 Commit 74e8e7b has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors rollup=maybe |
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2021
Remove must_use from ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value. Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods, particularly when the attribute has a long string value. As discussed in rust-lang#84309. Partially addresses rust-lang#81482. r? `@Manishearth`
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2021
Remove must_use from ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value. Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods, particularly when the attribute has a long string value. As discussed in rust-lang#84309. Partially addresses rust-lang#81482. r? ``@Manishearth``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80269 (Explain non-dropped sender recv in docs) - rust-lang#82179 (Add functions `Duration::try_from_secs_{f32, f64}`) - rust-lang#85608 (Stabilize `ops::ControlFlow` (just the type)) - rust-lang#85792 (Refactor windows sockets impl methods) - rust-lang#86220 (Improve maybe_uninit_extra docs) - rust-lang#86277 (Remove must_use from ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES) - rust-lang#86285 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#86294 (Stabilize {std, core}::prelude::rust_*.) - rust-lang#86306 (Add mailmap entries for myself) - rust-lang#86314 (Remove trailing triple backticks in `mut_keyword` docs) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value.
Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods, particularly when the attribute has a long string value.
As discussed in #84309. Partially addresses #81482.
r? @Manishearth