-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add module-level documentation for vec's in-place iteration #87667
Conversation
c208d77
to
2b48b28
Compare
2b48b28
to
683808e
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
688452c
to
252ee2d
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
252ee2d
to
cde60bc
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
cde60bc
to
ed5357a
Compare
The first two commits are now code motion, the 3rd commit contains the documentation changes. It may be easier to review that in isolation. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #89545) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
ed5357a
to
d3cb88c
Compare
@the8472 how have you been navigating these docs as you write them? I noticed you have a bunch of cross references to existing specialization traits like |
|
hmm, didn't seem to fix it but I just manually fixed the one dead link and it runs fine now. Surprised you're not running into the same issue but w/e. I'll check if the same issue is on master later and fix that separately. continues with review |
I also have |
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-review +S-waiting-on-author |
d3cb88c
to
29e29ce
Compare
@rustbot ready |
@the8472, can you mark the comments that have been resolved as such? |
Done, it was all of them. |
📌 Commit 29e29ce has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (6970f88): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
As requested in the last libs team meeting and during previous reviews.
Feel free to point out any gaps you encounter, after all non-obvious things may with hindsight seem obvious to me.
r? @yaahc
CC @steffahn